Edith Beckmann
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
- Catalytic Alkyne Reactions
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Papers in
-
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 6
-
- Insect Pest Control Strategies 6
- Co-authors
- Alistair Boyer (8 shared papers)Steven V. Ley (8 shared papers)Gemma E. Veitch (8 shared papers)Brenda J. Burke (5 shared papers)Sarah Maslen (3 shared papers)Carles Ayats (2 shared papers)Dieter Hoppe (4 shared papers)Andrea Pinto (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (3 papers)Synthesis (1 paper)Organic Letters (1 paper)Synlett (1 paper)Angewandte Chemie (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Edith Beckmann
11 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Biochemistry 51
- Organic Chemistry 161
- Pharmacology 33
- Plant Science 96
- Molecular Biology 134
Countries citing papers authored by Edith Beckmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Beckmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Beckmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Beckmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Beckmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Beckmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Beckmann. The network helps show where Edith Beckmann may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Edith Beckmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 141 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 1 |
About Edith Beckmann
Edith Beckmann is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Plant Science, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (6 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (6 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (3 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (2 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1 paper), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper) and Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (51 citations), Organic Chemistry (161 citations), Pharmacology (33 citations), Plant Science (96 citations) and Molecular Biology (134 citations). Edith Beckmann has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alistair Boyer, Steven V. Ley, Gemma E. Veitch, Brenda J. Burke, Sarah Maslen, Carles Ayats, Dieter Hoppe, Andrea Pinto and James C. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Synthesis, Organic Letters, Synlett and Angewandte Chemie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.