Eddie Reed
- Oncology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Benjamín C. BostickMeenakshi DabholkarCharles E. EgwuaguVilhelm A. BohrC. WeberGisele SarosyElise C. KohnCharles J. Link
- Topics
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (6 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (6 papers)DNA Repair Mechanisms (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUkraineMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Eddie Reed
24 papers receiving 769 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Oncology 326
- Molecular Biology 323
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 248
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 124
- Reproductive Medicine 115
Countries citing papers authored by Eddie Reed
This map shows the geographic impact of Eddie Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eddie Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eddie Reed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eddie Reed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eddie Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eddie Reed. The network helps show where Eddie Reed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eddie Reed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eddie Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eddie Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eddie Reed. Eddie Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | Effect of interleukin-1 alpha and tumour necrosis factor-alpha on cisplatin-induced ERCC-1 mRNA expression in a human ovarian carcinoma cell line. | 12 |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 63 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | Malignant and nonmalignant brain tissues differ in their messenger RNA expression patterns for ERCC1 and ERCC2. | 38 |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 202 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 254 |
About Eddie Reed
Eddie Reed is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Dermatology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 791 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (6 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (6 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (248 citations), Reproductive Medicine (115 citations) and Oncology (326 citations). Eddie Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ukraine and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Benjamín C. Bostick, Meenakshi Dabholkar, Charles E. Egwuagu, Vilhelm A. Bohr, C. Weber, Gisele Sarosy, Elise C. Kohn, Charles J. Link, Justine Vionnet and William D. Figg. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.