Ed Sutherland

449 total citations
9 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

Ed Sutherland is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Ed Sutherland has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Ed Sutherland's work include Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). Ed Sutherland is often cited by papers focused on Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). Ed Sutherland collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Ed Sutherland's co-authors include Peter Gardner, Tom White, Sophie Wells, S. J. Westerman, Christine Critchley, Clayton Hickey, Alec Solway, David E. Over, Mark Conner and K. I. Manktelow and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Psychology and Marketing and Food Quality and Preference.

In The Last Decade

Ed Sutherland

9 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ed Sutherland United Kingdom	7	172	121	99	75	34	9	310
Mike Keesman Netherlands	10	104 0.6×	87 0.7×	37 0.4×	54 0.7×	52 1.5×	15	426
Oh‐Ryeong Ha United States	10	30 0.2×	33 0.3×	23 0.2×	60 0.8×	25 0.7×	16	279
Mariko Kikutani Japan	8	93 0.5×	126 1.0×	12 0.1×	110 1.5×	23 0.7×	21	272
Naomi Ziv Israel	12	168 1.0×	128 1.1×	12 0.1×	214 2.9×	9 0.3×	23	387
Catherine Weir United Kingdom	10	75 0.4×	98 0.8×	26 0.3×	156 2.1×	10 0.3×	32	371
Erick G. Chuquichambi Spain	9	161 0.9×	157 1.3×	21 0.2×	209 2.8×	41 1.2×	23	336
Sharon M. Pearcey United States	8	63 0.4×	28 0.2×	13 0.1×	11 0.1×	9 0.3×	15	304
Valerie Freeman United States	10	11 0.1×	117 1.0×	30 0.3×	51 0.7×	8 0.2×	32	329
Annemieke Van den Tol United Kingdom	9	262 1.5×	83 0.7×	13 0.1×	256 3.4×	4 0.1×	18	493
Rebekah A. Wanic United States	4	104 0.6×	71 0.6×	25 0.3×	101 1.3×	4 0.1×	8	266

Countries citing papers authored by Ed Sutherland

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ed Sutherland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ed Sutherland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ed Sutherland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ed Sutherland

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ed Sutherland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ed Sutherland. The network helps show where Ed Sutherland may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ed Sutherland

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ed Sutherland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ed Sutherland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ed Sutherland. Ed Sutherland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Hugh‐Jones, Siobhan, et al.. (2022). “This doesn’t feel like living”: How the COVID-19 Pandemic Affected the Mental Health of Vulnerable University Students in the United Kingdom. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(2). 52–64. 3 indexed citations

Keane, David, Indranil Dasgupta, Elizabeth Lindley, et al.. (2021). Patient perspectives of target weight management and ultrafiltration in haemodialysis: a multi-center survey. BMC Nephrology. 22(1). 188–188. 2 indexed citations

Keane, David, et al.. (2019). Patients’ perceptions of their experience, control and knowledge of fluid management when receiving haemodialysis. Journal of Renal Care. 45(2). 83–92. 11 indexed citations

Gray‐Burrows, Kara, Natalie Taylor, Daryl B. O’Connor, et al.. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 253–268. 41 indexed citations

Westerman, S. J., Ed Sutherland, Peter Gardner, et al.. (2012). The design of consumer packaging: Effects of manipulations of shape, orientation, and alignment of graphical forms on consumers’ assessments. Food Quality and Preference. 27(1). 8–17. 88 indexed citations

Gardner, Peter, et al.. (2012). Product Design: Preference for Rounded versus Angular Design Elements. Psychology and Marketing. 29(8). 595–605. 119 indexed citations

Westerman, S. J., et al.. (2011). Ecommerce interface colour and consumer decision making: Two routes of influence. Color Research & Application. 37(4). 292–301. 8 indexed citations

Conner, Mark, et al.. (2008). Impact of alcohol on sexual decision making: Intentions to have unprotected sex. Psychology and Health. 23(8). 909–934. 10 indexed citations

Manktelow, K. I., Ed Sutherland, & David E. Over. (1995). Probabilistic factors in deontic reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning. 1(3). 201–219. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact