Ed Pentz

442 total citations
16 papers, 243 citations indexed

About

Ed Pentz is a scholar working on Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Ed Pentz has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 243 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Information Systems, 2 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 2 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Ed Pentz's work include Library Science and Information Systems (4 papers), Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (2 papers) and Data Quality and Management (2 papers). Ed Pentz is often cited by papers focused on Library Science and Information Systems (4 papers), Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (2 papers) and Data Quality and Management (2 papers). Ed Pentz collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Ed Pentz's co-authors include Haak Laurel, Laura Paglione, Martin Fenner, Herbert Van de Sompel, Priscilla Caplan, Sally Rogers, William H. Mischo and Cameron Neylon and has published in prestigious journals such as D-Lib Magazine, Learned Publishing and Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

In The Last Decade

Ed Pentz

12 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ed Pentz United States	5	132	70	66	43	41	16	243
Laura Paglione United States	5	112 0.8×	76 1.1×	59 0.9×	34 0.8×	45 1.1×	13	212
Frank Scholze Germany	7	170 1.3×	122 1.7×	41 0.6×	33 0.8×	56 1.4×	34	233
Heinz Pampel Germany	7	200 1.5×	150 2.1×	46 0.7×	36 0.8×	75 1.8×	61	292
Maxi Kindling Germany	7	169 1.3×	135 1.9×	32 0.5×	32 0.7×	75 1.8×	32	243
Marjorie M.K. Hlava United States	6	72 0.5×	72 1.0×	89 1.3×	40 0.9×	14 0.3×	27	254
Barbara Sierman Netherlands	4	139 1.1×	109 1.6×	14 0.2×	41 1.0×	41 1.0×	17	247
Konstantinos Repanas Belgium	5	94 0.7×	69 1.0×	29 0.4×	19 0.4×	33 0.8×	7	263
Ingrid Dillo Netherlands	5	145 1.1×	112 1.6×	14 0.2×	33 0.8×	55 1.3×	19	240
Hervé L’Hours United Kingdom	5	152 1.2×	121 1.7×	14 0.2×	36 0.8×	55 1.3×	13	248
Helen Eenmaa Estonia	5	116 0.9×	68 1.0×	36 0.5×	22 0.5×	31 0.8×	7	235

Countries citing papers authored by Ed Pentz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ed Pentz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ed Pentz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ed Pentz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ed Pentz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ed Pentz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ed Pentz. The network helps show where Ed Pentz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ed Pentz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ed Pentz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ed Pentz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ed Pentz. Ed Pentz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Pentz, Ed. (2022). Role of Crossref in journal publishing over the next decade. Science Editing. 9(1). 53–57.

2.

Laurel, Haak, et al.. (2017). Organization Identifier Project: Request for Information. Figshare.

3.

Neylon, Cameron, et al.. (2014). Standardized Metadata Elements to Identify Access and License Information. eSpace (Curtin University). 26(2). 35–35. 1 indexed citations

4.

Laurel, Haak, et al.. (2012). ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing. 25(4). 259–264. 174 indexed citations

5.

Pentz, Ed, et al.. (2012). Academic and Professional Publishing. Chandos Publishing eBooks. 13 indexed citations

6.

Pentz, Ed. (2011). CrossRef: Improving scholarly communications. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 54(1). 30–39. 1 indexed citations

7.

Pentz, Ed, et al.. (2009). The UKSG TRANSFER Project: collaboration to improve access to content. Serials The Journal for the Serials Community. 22(2). 161–165. 3 indexed citations

8.

Pentz, Ed. (2006). CrossRef at the crossroads. Learned Publishing. 19(4). 250–258. 4 indexed citations

9.

Pentz, Ed. (2004). Recent developments at CrossRef. Interlending & Document Supply. 32(3). 183–185. 4 indexed citations

10.

Pentz, Ed. (2004). CrossRef Monthly Newsletter.

11.

Pentz, Ed. (2002). About CrossRef. Journal of Information Processing and Management. 45(4). 227–227. 1 indexed citations

12.

Pentz, Ed. (2001). Crossref: the missing link. Serials The Journal for the Serials Community. 14(2). 194–198. 1 indexed citations

13.

Pentz, Ed. (2001). Brief communication: reference linking with CrossRef. Interlending & Document Supply. 29(1). 20–23. 5 indexed citations

14.

Caplan, Priscilla, et al.. (2001). Linking to the Appropriate Copy. D-Lib Magazine. 7(9). 23 indexed citations

15.

Pentz, Ed. (2001). CrossRef: The missing link. College & Research Libraries News. 62(2). 206–228. 3 indexed citations

16.

Pentz, Ed. (2001). CrossRef: A Collaborative Linking Network. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact