Earl D. Mitchell

521 total citations
32 papers, 391 citations indexed

About

Earl D. Mitchell is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Biotechnology. According to data from OpenAlex, Earl D. Mitchell has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 391 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Molecular Biology, 10 papers in Plant Science and 9 papers in Biotechnology. Recurrent topics in Earl D. Mitchell's work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (7 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (6 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (5 papers). Earl D. Mitchell is often cited by papers focused on Plant tissue culture and regeneration (7 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (6 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (5 papers). Earl D. Mitchell collaborates with scholars based in United States. Earl D. Mitchell's co-authors include George R. Waller, C. A. Hibberd, Daniel Wagner, S. M. Dabo, D. E. Weibel, R. L. Hintz, Michael R. Downing, Eldon C. Nelson, Kermit L. Carraway and Ralph H. Loring and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Earl D. Mitchell

31 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Earl D. Mitchell United States	13	200	154	71	54	45	32	391
David R. Biggs Australia	14	386 1.9×	244 1.6×	46 0.6×	23 0.4×	22 0.5×	28	672
D. L. LAIDMAN Canada	14	275 1.4×	324 2.1×	32 0.5×	120 2.2×	29 0.6×	51	573
Riddhi Datta India	13	279 1.4×	390 2.5×	20 0.3×	17 0.3×	14 0.3×	57	637
Igor V. Sarkissian United States	12	212 1.1×	192 1.2×	30 0.4×	22 0.4×	10 0.2×	41	429
R. A. Vierling United States	12	151 0.8×	367 2.4×	27 0.4×	14 0.3×	29 0.6×	22	565
F. B. Johnston Canada	13	191 1.0×	274 1.8×	13 0.2×	42 0.8×	31 0.7×	21	457
J. F. Chaplin United States	14	275 1.4×	361 2.3×	11 0.2×	24 0.4×	54 1.2×	57	565
Judith A. Pearson Australia	13	235 1.2×	134 0.9×	8 0.1×	76 1.4×	15 0.3×	19	518
Louis Chavant France	11	284 1.4×	233 1.5×	8 0.1×	20 0.4×	33 0.7×	21	507
Clifford J. Pollard United States	16	274 1.4×	249 1.6×	15 0.2×	195 3.6×	33 0.7×	34	650

Countries citing papers authored by Earl D. Mitchell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Earl D. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Earl D. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Earl D. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Earl D. Mitchell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Earl D. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Earl D. Mitchell. The network helps show where Earl D. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Earl D. Mitchell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Earl D. Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Earl D. Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Earl D. Mitchell. Earl D. Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Dabo, S. M., et al.. (1993). A Method for the Isolation of Nuclear DNA from Cotton (Gossypium) Leaves. Analytical Biochemistry. 210(1). 34–38. 31 indexed citations

Streeter, M. N., Daniel Wagner, C. A. Hibberd, Earl D. Mitchell, & J. W. Oltjen. (1990). Effect of variety of sorghum grain on digestion and availability of dry matter and starch in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 29(3-4). 279–287. 21 indexed citations

Hussain, M. Mahmood, et al.. (1987). Replication of Cauliflower Mosaic Virus DNA in Leaves and Suspension Culture Protoplasts of Cotton. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 83(3). 633–639. 6 indexed citations

Taliaferro, C. M., et al.. (1987). In vitro regeneration of apomictic bluestem grasses. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 10(1). 31–38. 15 indexed citations

Mitchell, Earl D.. (1985). 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase and Mevalonate Kinase Activity in Turkey Liver and Kidney. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science. 65. 5–10.

Mitchell, Earl D., et al.. (1984). The L-aspartate oxidase reported to be present in higher plants is actually glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 123(2). 836–841. 2 indexed citations

Pittman, Roy N., et al.. (1983). In Vitro Culture of Immature Peanut (Arachis spp.) Leaves: Morphogenesis and Plantlet Regeneration1,2. Peanut Science. 10(1). 21–25. 27 indexed citations

Hibberd, C. A., et al.. (1982). Digestibility Characteristics of Isolated Starch from Sorghum and Corn Grain. Journal of Animal Science. 55(6). 1490–1497. 32 indexed citations

Hibberd, C. A., et al.. (1982). Nutritive Characteristics of Different Varieties of Sorghum and Corn Grains. Journal of Animal Science. 55(3). 665–672. 24 indexed citations

10.

Downing, Michael R., et al.. (1979). Growth of callus and suspension culture cells from cotton varieties (Gossypium hirsutum L.) resistant and susceptible toxanthomonas malvacearum (E. F. Sm.) dows. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant. 15(5). 368–373. 14 indexed citations

11.

Mitchell, Earl D., et al.. (1978). In Vitro Propagation of Broccoli from Stem, Leaf, and Leaf Rib Explants1. HortScience. 13(3). 246–247. 7 indexed citations

12.

Mitchell, Earl D., et al.. (1976). Purification and properties of a β-N-acetylaminoglucohydrolase from malted barley. Phytochemistry. 15(12). 1869–1871. 7 indexed citations

13.

Downing, Michael R. & Earl D. Mitchell. (1975). Mevalonate-activating enzymes in callus culture cells from Nepeta cataria. Phytochemistry. 14(2). 369–371. 6 indexed citations

14.

Downing, Michael R. & Earl D. Mitchell. (1974). Metabolism of mevalonic acid to phosphorylated intermediates in a cell-free extract from Nepeta cataria leaves. Phytochemistry. 13(8). 1419–1421. 2 indexed citations

15.

Mitchell, Earl D., et al.. (1973). Quaternary structure of Bacillus subtilis α-amylase anomalous behavior in sodium dodecyl sulfate. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure. 295(1). 314–322. 28 indexed citations

16.

Mitchell, Earl D.. (1972). Homogeneous α-amylase from malted barley. Phytochemistry. 11(5). 1673–1676. 15 indexed citations

17.

Scheppele, Stuart E., et al.. (1970). Mass spectrometry—II: The unimolecular decomposition of benzaldehyde azine in the gas phase induced by electron‐impact. Organic Mass Spectrometry. 3(5). 557–569. 3 indexed citations

18.

Mitchell, Earl D., et al.. (1969). Effect of phenolic acids on alpha-amylase in vitro, and early growth of sugarbeet. Journal of Sugarbeet Research. 15(7). 556–561. 3 indexed citations

19.

Waller, George R., et al.. (1969). Feline Attractant, cis , trans -Nepetalactone: Metabolism in the Domestic Cat. Science. 164(3885). 1281–1282. 33 indexed citations

20.

Scheppele, Stuart E., et al.. (1968). Mass spectrometry. I. Evidence for phenyl, hydrogen, and methyl migrations in the unimolecular decomposition of acetophenone azine induced by electron impact. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 90(13). 3521–3525. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact