Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants
2003754 citationsJohn H. Pavlish, E.A. Sondreal et al.Fuel Processing Technologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of E.A. Sondreal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.A. Sondreal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.A. Sondreal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.A. Sondreal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.A. Sondreal. The network helps show where E.A. Sondreal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E.A. Sondreal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E.A. Sondreal.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E.A. Sondreal based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E.A. Sondreal. E.A. Sondreal is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pavlish, John H., E.A. Sondreal, Michael D. Mann, et al.. (2003). Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Processing Technology. 82(2-3). 89–165.754 indexed citations breakdown →
Sondreal, E.A., Michael D. Mann, Gerhard‐Wilhelm Weber, & B.C. Young. (1995). Advanced power assessment for Czech lignite, Task 3.6, Part 2. The 2nd international conference on energy and environment: Transitions in East Central Europe. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
8.
Benson, Steven A., E.A. Sondreal, & John P. Hurley. (1995). Status of coal ash behavior research. Fuel Processing Technology. 44(1-3). 1–12.46 indexed citations
9.
Sondreal, E.A., et al.. (1986). Review of slagging and fouling from low-rank coals: Plant survey, bibliography, and discussion: Volume 1, plant survey and discussion: Final report. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).2 indexed citations
Sondreal, E.A., et al.. (1976). Ash fouling potentials of Western subbituminous coal as determined in a pilot plant test furnace. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
14.
Patterson, Donald J., Robert H. Kadlec, & E.A. Sondreal. (1973). Warmup Limitations on Thermal Reactor Oxidation. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1.4 indexed citations
Lord, H. A., E.A. Sondreal, R.H. Kadlec, & Donald J. Patterson. (1973). Reactor Studies for Exhaust Oxidation Rates. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1.16 indexed citations
Patterson, Donald J., et al.. (1969). Kinetics of oxidation and quenching of combustibles in exhaust systems of gasoline engines : annual progress report no. 1.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.