E. Zipper

484 citations
49 papers · 345 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

E. Zipper

47 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

E. Zipper
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Condensed Matter Physics 116
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 257
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 57
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 28
  • Artificial Intelligence 71
Replace Д. В. Шовкун with:
Д. В. Шовкун Russia
Th. Östreich United States
M. L. Polianski United States
Gabriele Campagnano Italy
W. Apel Germany
R. Takayama Japan
Valentin Crépel United States
A. S. Yeh United States
Shiue-Yuan Shiau Taiwan
E. Zipper relative to Д. В. Шовкун Russia Д. В. Шовкун's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Д. В. Шовкун · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Zipper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Zipper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Zipper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Zipper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Zipper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Zipper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Zipper. The network helps show where E. Zipper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside E. Zipper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Zipper Line = papers co-authored together E. Zipper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199154
2 200636
3 201122
4 198217
5 201215
6 200512
7 199211
8 199510
9 200510
10 201010
11 19839
12 20039
13 19998
14 20048
15
Heat Currents in Non-Superconducting Flux Qubits
20087
16 20087
17 19847
18
Dot-ring nanostructure: rigorous analysis of many-electron effects
20187
19 19877
20 19916

About E. Zipper

E. Zipper is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry, having authored 49 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (21 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (11 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (11 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (9 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (9 papers), Graphene research and applications (6 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (6 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (116 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (257 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (57 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (28 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (71 citations). E. Zipper has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Germany and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Marcin Kurpas, Jerzy Dajka, D. Wohlleben, Maciej M. Maśka, Magdalena Margańska, M. Lisowski, J. Sadowski, A. Ślebarski, J. Łuczka and A. Vourdas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, physica status solidi (b), Physical Review B, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact