E. Yoshida-Shaul

909 total citations
22 papers, 811 citations indexed

About

E. Yoshida-Shaul is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Yoshida-Shaul has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 811 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Insect Science, 18 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in E. Yoshida-Shaul's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (22 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (15 papers) and Study of Mite Species (8 papers). E. Yoshida-Shaul is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (22 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (15 papers) and Study of Mite Species (8 papers). E. Yoshida-Shaul collaborates with scholars based in Canada. E. Yoshida-Shaul's co-authors include D. A. Chant and has published in prestigious journals such as Canadian Journal of Zoology, Acarologia and International Journal of Acarology.

In The Last Decade

E. Yoshida-Shaul

22 papers receiving 729 citations

Peers

E. Yoshida-Shaul

EEBS

GENET

ECOLO

E. Schicha United States

H. J. Rowell Canada

Nora Cristina Mesa Cobo Colombia

J. Eisenbach United States

Rajendra Singh India

R. van Maanen Netherlands

Shahab Manzari Iran

Eline Benestad Hågvar Norway

D. Lykouressis Greece

J. C. Malausa France

E. Schicha United States

E. Yoshida-Shaul

402 ×0.5

300 ×0.4

EEBS

126 ×1.0

24 ×0.9

GENET

19 ×0.8

ECOLO

Citations per year, relative to E. Yoshida-Shaul E. Yoshida-Shaul (= 1×) peers E. Schicha

Countries citing papers authored by E. Yoshida-Shaul

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Yoshida-Shaul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Yoshida-Shaul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Yoshida-Shaul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Yoshida-Shaul

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Yoshida-Shaul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Yoshida-Shaul. The network helps show where E. Yoshida-Shaul may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Yoshida-Shaul

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Yoshida-Shaul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Yoshida-Shaul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Yoshida-Shaul. E. Yoshida-Shaul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Yoshida-Shaul, E. & D. A. Chant. (1997). A world review of the genus Phytoscutus Muma (Phytoseiidae: Acari). Acarologia. 38(3). 219–238. 14 indexed citations

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1992). A revision of the tribe Phytoseiini Berlese with a world review of thepursegloveispecies group in the genusPhytoseiusRibaga (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology. 18(1). 5–23. 17 indexed citations

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1992). Adult idiosomal setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). International Journal of Acarology. 18(3). 177–193. 222 indexed citations

Yoshida-Shaul, E. & D. A. Chant. (1991). Five new species of Phytoseiidae from Central and South America (Acari: Gamasina). International Journal of Acarology. 17(2). 93–102. 13 indexed citations

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1990). The identities ofAmblyseius Andersoni(Chant) andA. Potentillae(Garman) in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). International Journal of Acarology. 16(1). 5–12. 24 indexed citations

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1989). A world review of the tiliarum species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 67(4). 1006–1046. 22 indexed citations

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1989). Adult dorsal setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina).. International Journal of Acarology. 15(4). 219–233. 60 indexed citations

Yoshida-Shaul, E. & D. A. Chant. (1988). Descriptions of two unusual new species in the genus Amblyseius Berlese (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 66(9). 2053–2056. 11 indexed citations

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1987). A note on the subfamily Chantiinae Pritchard and Baker (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 65(10). 2574–2574. 2 indexed citations

10.

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1987). A world review of the pyri species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 65(7). 1770–1804. 76 indexed citations

11.

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1986). The subfamily Chantiinae in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 64(9). 2024–2034. 13 indexed citations

12.

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1986). A world review of the ecclesiasticus species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 64(2). 447–466. 13 indexed citations

13.

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1986). A new subfamily, Cydnodromellinae, in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 64(12). 2811–2823. 28 indexed citations

14.

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1984). A world review of four species groups in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae): brevicollis, luculentis, carinulatus, and pinnatus. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 62(12). 2631–2642. 3 indexed citations

15.

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1984). A world review of the occidentalis species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 62(9). 1860–1871. 59 indexed citations

16.

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1984). A world review of five similar species groups in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten. Part III. The pini group (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 62(2). 276–290. 11 indexed citations

17.

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1984). A world review of the australicus species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 62(12). 2643–2647. 5 indexed citations

18.

Yoshida-Shaul, E. & D. A. Chant. (1983). Ontogenetic development of setae in two species groups in the genusTyphlodromusScheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology. 9(2). 81–89. 11 indexed citations

19.

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1983). A world review of five similar species groups in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten. Part I. The regularis and theodoliticus groups (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 61(5). 1032–1040. 9 indexed citations

20.

Chant, D. A. & E. Yoshida-Shaul. (1983). A world review of five similar species groups in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten. Part II. The conspicuus and cornus groups (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 61(5). 1041–1057. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact