E. Wulf

409 total citations
11 papers, 323 citations indexed

About

E. Wulf is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Wulf has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 323 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 4 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Recurrent topics in E. Wulf's work include Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers) and Rare-earth and actinide compounds (4 papers). E. Wulf is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers) and Rare-earth and actinide compounds (4 papers). E. Wulf collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Slovakia. E. Wulf's co-authors include S. Maťaš, S. Gabáni, К. Flachbart, K. Siemensmeyer, N. Yu. Shitsevalova, Pavol Priputen, H.-J. Mikeska, A. Zheludev, D. Hüvonen and S. Mühlbauer and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B and Physical review. B..

In The Last Decade

E. Wulf

11 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. Wulf Switzerland 9 303 134 103 32 21 11 323
O. Rösch Germany 9 320 1.1× 204 1.5× 106 1.0× 42 1.3× 21 1.0× 14 357
Shuzo Kawarazaki Japan 11 308 1.0× 283 2.1× 99 1.0× 42 1.3× 16 0.8× 25 370
T. Örd Estonia 12 290 1.0× 167 1.2× 74 0.7× 64 2.0× 23 1.1× 48 365
Mikito Koga Japan 11 314 1.0× 159 1.2× 156 1.5× 38 1.2× 13 0.6× 39 349
P. Pedrazzini Argentina 11 318 1.0× 265 2.0× 88 0.9× 39 1.2× 27 1.3× 44 363
Andreas Hausoel Austria 8 304 1.0× 159 1.2× 186 1.8× 60 1.9× 21 1.0× 10 372
S. Krämer Germany 10 346 1.1× 201 1.5× 102 1.0× 30 0.9× 18 0.9× 19 393
V. A. Moskalenko Moldova 10 391 1.3× 192 1.4× 209 2.0× 30 0.9× 14 0.7× 86 414
Sébastien Burdin France 11 440 1.5× 198 1.5× 174 1.7× 45 1.4× 10 0.5× 32 475
John Collini United States 6 240 0.8× 191 1.4× 68 0.7× 23 0.7× 24 1.1× 11 273

Countries citing papers authored by E. Wulf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Wulf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Wulf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Wulf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Wulf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Wulf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Wulf. The network helps show where E. Wulf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Wulf

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Wulf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Wulf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Wulf. E. Wulf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Povarov, K. Yu., et al.. (2017). Quantum criticality in a three-dimensional spin system at zero field and pressure. Physical review. B.. 96(14). 7 indexed citations
2.
Wulf, E., D. Hüvonen, Rico Schönemann, et al.. (2015). Critical exponents and intrinsic broadening of the field-induced transition inNiCl2·4SC(NH2)2. Physical Review B. 91(1). 14 indexed citations
3.
Povarov, K. Yu., et al.. (2015). Giant dielectric nonlinearities at a magnetic Bose-Einstein condensation. Physical Review B. 92(14). 5 indexed citations
4.
Povarov, K. Yu., E. Wulf, D. Hüvonen, et al.. (2015). Dynamics of a bond-disorderedS=1quantum magnet nearz=1criticality. Physical Review B. 92(2). 16 indexed citations
5.
Wulf, E., D. Hüvonen, Jae‐Wook Kim, et al.. (2013). Criticality in a disordered quantum antiferromagnet studied by neutron diffraction. Physical Review B. 88(17). 19 indexed citations
6.
Schrettle, F., S. Krohns, P. Lunkenheimer, et al.. (2013). Magnetic-field induced multiferroicity in a quantum critical frustrated spin liquid. Physical Review B. 87(12). 13 indexed citations
7.
Wulf, E., et al.. (2011). Disorder instability of the magnon condensate in a frustrated spin ladder. Physical Review B. 84(17). 18 indexed citations
8.
Maťaš, S., K. Siemensmeyer, Elisa M. Wheeler, et al.. (2010). Magnetism of rare earth tetraborides. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 200(3). 32041–32041. 47 indexed citations
9.
Siemensmeyer, K., E. Wulf, H.-J. Mikeska, et al.. (2008). Fractional Magnetization Plateaus and Magnetic Order in the Shastry-Sutherland MagnetTmB4. Physical Review Letters. 101(17). 177201–177201. 133 indexed citations
10.
Gabáni, S., S. Maťaš, Pavol Priputen, et al.. (2008). Magnetic Structure and Phase Diagram of TmB4. Acta Physica Polonica A. 113(1). 227–230. 24 indexed citations
11.
Siemensmeyer, K., K. Habicht, Th. Lonkai, et al.. (2007). Magnetic Properties of the Frustrated fcc – Antiferromagnet HoB12 Above and Below T N. Journal of Low Temperature Physics. 146(5-6). 581–605. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026