E. W. Abrahamson
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 2%
- Co-authors
- H. C. Longuet–HigginsSanford E. OstroyRoger S. FagerRaymond P. PoincelotWilliam T. MasonV. StannettNicholas E. GeacintovRainer Uhl
- Topics
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (38 papers)Retinal Development and Disorders (19 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
E. W. Abrahamson
78 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Molecular Biology 958
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 957
- Organic Chemistry 402
- Spectroscopy 328
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 303
Countries citing papers authored by E. W. Abrahamson
This map shows the geographic impact of E. W. Abrahamson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. W. Abrahamson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. W. Abrahamson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. W. Abrahamson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. W. Abrahamson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. W. Abrahamson. The network helps show where E. W. Abrahamson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. W. Abrahamson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. W. Abrahamson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. W. Abrahamson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. W. Abrahamson. E. W. Abrahamson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 120 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About E. W. Abrahamson
E. W. Abrahamson is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (38 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (19 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (957 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (303 citations) and Spectroscopy (328 citations). E. W. Abrahamson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include H. C. Longuet–Higgins, Sanford E. Ostroy, Roger S. Fager, Raymond P. Poincelot, William T. Mason, V. Stannett, Nicholas E. Geacintov, Rainer Uhl, J. R. Wiesenfeld and Henry Linschitz. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Chemical Reviews and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.