E. Stengel
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Papers in
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 9
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 1
-
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 5
- Co-authors
- Donald Maxwell Parkin (1 shared paper)A. N. Oppenheim (1 shared paper)A. S. C. Ehrenberg (2 shared papers)Lee L. Bean (1 shared paper)Max P. Pepper (1 shared paper)Jerome K. Myers (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (9 papers)The Lancet (3 papers)Journal of Psychosomatic Research (2 papers)British Journal of Sociology (1 paper)Brain (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomMexicoGermany
In The Last Decade
E. Stengel
49 papers receiving 567 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Psychology 388
- Psychiatry and Mental health 135
- Emergency Medicine 59
- Philosophy 66
- General Psychology 7
Countries citing papers authored by E. Stengel
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Stengel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Stengel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Stengel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Stengel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Stengel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Stengel. The network helps show where E. Stengel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside E. Stengel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1965 | 83 | |
| 2 | 1959 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1952 | 69 | |
| 4 | 1966 | 69 | |
| 5 | 1958 | 54 | |
| 6 | 1965 | 37 | |
| 7 | 1960 | 34 | |
| 8 | 1958 | 33 | |
| 9 | 1962 | 30 | |
| 10 | 1962 | 28 | |
| 11 | 1951 | 26 | |
| 12 | 1955 | 26 | |
| 13 | 1963 | 18 | |
| 14 | The social effects of attempted suicide. | 1956 | 17 |
| 15 | 1963 | 17 | |
| 16 | 1961 | 15 | |
| 17 | 1960 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1955 | 9 | |
| 19 | A re-evaluation of Freud's book On Aphasia; its significance for psycho-analysis. | 1954 | 9 |
| 20 | 1958 | 8 |
About E. Stengel
E. Stengel is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Neurology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 52 papers that have together received 751 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (9 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (4 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (388 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (135 citations), Emergency Medicine (59 citations), Philosophy (66 citations) and General Psychology (7 citations). E. Stengel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Donald Maxwell Parkin, A. N. Oppenheim, A. S. C. Ehrenberg, Lee L. Bean, Max P. Pepper and Jerome K. Myers. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, The Lancet, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, British Journal of Sociology and Brain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.