E. Scalici

411 citations
12 papers · 277 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

E. Scalici

12 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

E. Scalici
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Reproductive Medicine 111
  • Cancer Research 62
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 111
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 24
  • Aging 5
Replace Ruihuan Gu with:
Ruihuan Gu China
Lucette van der Westerlaken Netherlands
Samir N. Babayev United States
Chuanhui Guo China
De-sheng Ye China
Mor Jack Ng Singapore
Jianzhi Ren China
Haiying Liu China
Mark Grossmann Spain
Julia F. Litzky United States
E. Scalici relative to Ruihuan Gu China Ruihuan Gu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Ruihuan Gu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Scalici

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Scalici's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Scalici with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Scalici more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Scalici

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Scalici. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Scalici. The network helps show where E. Scalici may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside E. Scalici, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Scalici Line = papers co-authored together E. Scalici links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201682
2 201454
3 201440
4 201636
5 201526
6 201616
7 20157
8
Number of Intermediate Follicles. An Independent Risk Factor of Multiple Pregnancies in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles with Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone.
20155
9 20154
10 20143
11 20143
12 20151

About E. Scalici

E. Scalici is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cancer Research, having authored 12 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (3 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (2 papers), Renal and related cancers (2 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (1 paper), Reproductive Health and Technologies (1 paper) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (111 citations), Cancer Research (62 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (111 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (24 citations) and Aging (5 citations). E. Scalici has collaborated with scholars based in France. Frequent co-authors include S. Hamamah, Sabine Traver, S. Belloc, Shaliha Bechoua, Nicolas Molinari, C. Brunet, D. Haouzi, Saïd Assou, N. Molinari and T. Anahory. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Andrology, PLoS ONE, Human Reproduction Update and Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact