E. Piasecki

753 total citations
37 papers, 260 citations indexed

About

E. Piasecki is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Piasecki has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 260 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 16 papers in Radiation and 13 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in E. Piasecki's work include Nuclear physics research studies (29 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (12 papers). E. Piasecki is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (29 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (12 papers). E. Piasecki collaborates with scholars based in Poland, Russia and Ukraine. E. Piasecki's co-authors include M. Kowalczyk, A. Trzcińska, Ł. Świderski, M. Kisieliński, К. Rusek, Z. Wilhelmi, T. Krogulski, A. Kordyasz, K. Piasecki and J. Jastrzębski and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

E. Piasecki

35 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. Piasecki Poland 10 202 109 75 41 26 37 260
K. J. Hofstetter United States 11 153 0.8× 74 0.7× 137 1.8× 55 1.3× 24 0.9× 39 280
A. E. Negri Argentina 10 371 1.8× 199 1.8× 82 1.1× 21 0.5× 27 1.0× 28 414
J. Birkhan Germany 8 213 1.1× 82 0.8× 48 0.6× 11 0.3× 32 1.2× 15 268
T. Ramsøy Norway 10 391 1.9× 159 1.5× 127 1.7× 12 0.3× 59 2.3× 24 435
O. Rodrı́guez Brazil 13 430 2.1× 191 1.8× 98 1.3× 23 0.6× 129 5.0× 37 530
R. Horn Germany 10 94 0.5× 113 1.0× 64 0.9× 32 0.8× 26 1.0× 12 237
Ali H. Ahmed Iraq 10 180 0.9× 71 0.7× 55 0.7× 23 0.6× 39 1.5× 48 286
N. Özkan Türkiye 13 349 1.7× 101 0.9× 148 2.0× 34 0.8× 63 2.4× 28 443
W.J. Vermeer Australia 13 360 1.8× 247 2.3× 95 1.3× 15 0.4× 25 1.0× 34 426
S. Thummerer Germany 12 373 1.8× 247 2.3× 87 1.2× 11 0.3× 13 0.5× 29 402

Countries citing papers authored by E. Piasecki

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Piasecki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Piasecki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Piasecki more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Piasecki

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Piasecki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Piasecki. The network helps show where E. Piasecki may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Piasecki

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Piasecki. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Piasecki based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Piasecki. E. Piasecki is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rudchik, A.T., К. Rusek, K. W. Kemper, et al.. (2022). Elastic and inelastic scattering of 15N ions by 10B at energy 81 MeV. Isotopic effects in scattering of 15N + 10В, 15N + 11В, 14N + 10В nuclei. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 23(3). 153–158.
2.
Burtebayev, N., S.B. Sakuta, К. Rusek, et al.. (2019). Measurement and analysis of 10B +12C elastic scattering at energy of 41.3MeV. International Journal of Modern Physics E. 28(4). 1950028–1950028. 3 indexed citations
3.
Rudchik, A.T., K. W. Kemper, К. Rusek, et al.. (2019). 12C(15N, 14C)13N reaction at 81 MeV. Competition between one and two particle transfers. Nuclear Physics A. 992. 121638–121638. 1 indexed citations
4.
Rudchik, A.T., К. Rusek, K. W. Kemper, et al.. (2018). Elastic and inelastic scattering of 15N ions by 12C nuclei at energy 81 MeV. Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy. 19(3). 210–219. 1 indexed citations
5.
Burtebayev, N., S.B. Sakuta, К. Rusek, et al.. (2018). Scattering of $^{15}$N Ions by $^{10, 11}$B Nuclei at the Energy of 43 MeV. Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement. 11(1). 99–99. 2 indexed citations
6.
Rudchik, A.T., K. W. Kemper, К. Rusek, et al.. (2016). Elastic and inelastic scattering of 15N ions by 7Li at 81 MeV versus that of 14N ions by 7Li at 80 and 110 MeV. Nuclear Physics A. 958. 234–245. 1 indexed citations
7.
Trzcińska, A., E. Piasecki, W. Czarnacki, et al.. (2016). Examination of the influence of transfer channels on the barrier height distribution: Scattering ofNe20onNi58,Ni60, andNi61at near-barrier energies. Physical review. C. 93(5). 3 indexed citations
9.
Piasecki, E., Ł. Świderski, N. Keeley, et al.. (2012). Smoothing of structure in the fusion and quasielastic barrier distributions for the20Ne+208Pb system. Physical Review C. 85(5). 20 indexed citations
10.
Rudchik, A.T., Yu.O. Shyrma, K. W. Kemper, et al.. (2011). Elastic and inelastic scattering of 14C + 18O versus 12, 13C + 18O and 14C + 16O. The European Physical Journal A. 47(4). 5 indexed citations
11.
Rudchik, A.T., Yu.O. Shyrma, E.І. Koshchy, et al.. (2010). Isotopic effects in elastic and inelastic 12,13C + 16,18O scattering. Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy. 11(3). 251–261. 1 indexed citations
12.
Rudchik, A.T., Yu.O. Shyrma, E.І. Koshchy, et al.. (2010). Elastic and inelastic scattering of the 14C + 18O nuclei. Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy. 11(4). 379–388. 1 indexed citations
13.
Piasecki, E., Ł. Świderski, К. Rusek, et al.. (2007). STRUCTURE OF BARRIER DISTRIBUTIONS: PROBING THE ROLE OF NEUTRON-TRANSFER CHANNELS. International Journal of Modern Physics E. 16(2). 502–510. 2 indexed citations
14.
Kordyasz, A., et al.. (2003). Monolithic silicon E-DeltaE telescope produced by the Quasi-Selective Epitaxy. Nukleonika. 48. 31–34. 4 indexed citations
15.
Bonaccorso, A., et al.. (1997). Separation of Coulomb fission from nuclear fission at medium energies. Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei. 358(3). 329–336. 2 indexed citations
16.
Piasecki, E., L. Pieńkowski, A. Tucholski, et al.. (1996). Evidence for Coulomb fission of 238U in the interaction of 24.3 MeV/nucleon 238U with 197Au: a new experimental approach. Physics Letters B. 377(4). 235–240. 5 indexed citations
17.
Piasecki, E., et al.. (1990). Analysis of gamma-radioactivity of “hot particles” released after the Chernobyl accident. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 141(2). 221–242. 9 indexed citations
18.
Piasecki, E., et al.. (1990). Analysis of gamma-radioactivity of “hot particles” released after the Chernobyl accident. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 141(2). 243–259. 15 indexed citations
19.
Piasecki, E., et al.. (1989). Isotopic Composition of High-activity Particles Released in the Chernobyl Accident. Health Physics. 57(5). 707–716. 19 indexed citations
20.
Tomasi, E., D. Ardouin, Vladan Bernard, et al.. (1982). Fusion excitation function of the 40Ca + 40Ca system close to the threshold. Nuclear Physics A. 373(2). 341–348. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026