E. Parker Johnson

587 total citations
11 papers, 396 citations indexed

About

E. Parker Johnson is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Parker Johnson has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 396 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in E. Parker Johnson's work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers). E. Parker Johnson is often cited by papers focused on Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers). E. Parker Johnson collaborates with scholars based in United States. E. Parker Johnson's co-authors include Lorrin A. Riggs, John C. Armington, Neil R. Bartlett, Tom N. Cornsweet, Sean Thompson, Eliseo Güallar, Jinan Saaddine, Varshini Varadaraj, Bonnielin K. Swenor and C. R. Cavonius and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and American Psychologist.

In The Last Decade

E. Parker Johnson

11 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. Parker Johnson United States 8 219 167 166 158 50 11 396
Yoshiro Fukada Japan 8 238 1.1× 242 1.4× 318 1.9× 57 0.4× 16 0.3× 17 458
Leo E. Lipetz United States 11 178 0.8× 187 1.1× 140 0.8× 41 0.3× 30 0.6× 24 377
R. Pflug Austria 11 361 1.6× 238 1.4× 171 1.0× 207 1.3× 117 2.3× 14 593
Richard M. Copenhaver United States 11 122 0.6× 74 0.4× 126 0.8× 82 0.5× 15 0.3× 16 284
R. Oehler Germany 4 382 1.7× 180 1.1× 474 2.9× 189 1.2× 37 0.7× 5 671
Steven J. Cool United States 7 166 0.8× 156 0.9× 314 1.9× 84 0.5× 30 0.6× 11 454
G L Trick United States 10 382 1.7× 188 1.1× 148 0.9× 393 2.5× 146 2.9× 13 629
E.J. DeBruyn United States 10 211 1.0× 204 1.2× 335 2.0× 64 0.4× 14 0.3× 12 467
Stevan M. Dawis United States 10 314 1.4× 211 1.3× 169 1.0× 31 0.2× 27 0.5× 16 460
Renate Hanitzsch Germany 13 356 1.6× 322 1.9× 52 0.3× 103 0.7× 36 0.7× 45 438

Countries citing papers authored by E. Parker Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Parker Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Parker Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Parker Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Parker Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Parker Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Parker Johnson. The network helps show where E. Parker Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Parker Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Parker Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Parker Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Parker Johnson. E. Parker Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Zhao, Di, Eliseo Güallar, Bonnielin K. Swenor, et al.. (2017). Optimizing Glaucoma Screening in High-Risk Population: Design and 1-Year Findings of the Screening to Prevent (SToP) Glaucoma Study. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 180. 18–28. 32 indexed citations
2.
Varadaraj, Varshini, Di Zhao, E. Parker Johnson, et al.. (2017). Autorefraction-Based Prescription and Mailed Delivery of Eyeglasses. Ophthalmology. 125(1). 137–138. 5 indexed citations
3.
Riggs, Lorrin A., et al.. (1966). Electrical Responses of the Human Eye to Changes in Wavelength of the Stimulating Light*. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 56(11). 1621–1621. 40 indexed citations
4.
Riggs, Lorrin A., et al.. (1964). Electrical Responses of the Human Eye to Moving Stimulus Patterns. Science. 144(3618). 567–567. 90 indexed citations
5.
Riggs, Lorrin A., C. R. Cavonius, & E. Parker Johnson. (1961). Photographic Cumulation of Recurrent Response Potentials. Nature. 189(4762). 383–384. 6 indexed citations
6.
Johnson, E. Parker. (1958). The Character of the B-Wave in the Human Electroretinogram. Archives of Ophthalmology. 60(4). 565–591. 31 indexed citations
7.
Johnson, E. Parker. (1956). On Readmitting the Mind.. American Psychologist. 11(12). 712–714. 3 indexed citations
8.
Johnson, E. Parker & Neil R. Bartlett. (1956). Effect of Stimulus Duration on Electrical Responses of the Human Retina. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 46(3). 167–167. 47 indexed citations
9.
Johnson, E. Parker & Tom N. Cornsweet. (1954). Electroretinal Photopic Sensitivity Curves. Nature. 174(4430). 614–615. 35 indexed citations
10.
Armington, John C., E. Parker Johnson, & Lorrin A. Riggs. (1952). The scotopic A‐wave in the electrical response of the human retina. The Journal of Physiology. 118(3). 289–298. 78 indexed citations
11.
Johnson, E. Parker & Lorrin A. Riggs. (1951). Electroretinal and psychophysical dark adaptation curves.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 41(2). 139–147. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026