E. M. Smith

44 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

E. M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 177
  • Biological Psychiatry 65
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 74
  • Clinical Psychology 201
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 170
Replace Myrin Borysenko with:
Myrin Borysenko United States
Noriyuki Kawamura Japan
Kjerstin Larsson Sweden
D Riad-Fahmy United Kingdom
R. F. W. VINING Australia
G F Read United Kingdom
Lorentz E. Wittmers United States
Robert E. Faith United States
Kirsten M. Vogelsong United States
Laurence Maynard United States
E. M. Smith relative to Myrin Borysenko United States Myrin Borysenko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Myrin Borysenko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. Smith. The network helps show where E. M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together E. M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997240
2
A complete regulatory loop between the immune and neuroendocrine systems.
1985186
3 1985174
4 1977138
5 199269
6
Enkephalins-endorphins: stress and the immune system
198568
7 198657
8 196041
9 197630
10
Role of leukocyte-derived pro-opiomelanocortin peptides in endotoxic shock.
199129
11 197926
12 196923
13 199722
14 198910
15 19979
16 19839
17 19558
18 19798
19 19727
20 19726

About E. M. Smith

E. M. Smith is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Behavioral Neuroscience and Plant Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Heat Transfer and Optimization (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (3 papers), Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems (3 papers), Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (3 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (3 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (177 citations), Biological Psychiatry (65 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (74 citations), Clinical Psychology (201 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (170 citations). E. M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include J. Edwin Blalock, J. Curtis McMillen, R. H. Fisher, Thomas K. Hughes, Charles N. Reilley, Farhad B. Hashemi, George B. Stefano, J. Hattingh, T. C. Bridges and O. J. Loewer. Their work appears in journals such as Agronomy Journal, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact