E. M. I. Williams

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
13 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

E. M. I. Williams is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Oncology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, E. M. I. Williams has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in E. M. I. Williams's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers). E. M. I. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers). E. M. I. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Estonia. E. M. I. Williams's co-authors include Gillian Maudsley, John Ellershaw, Abeer M. Shaaban, Christopher S. Foster, Christopher R. West, C Jarvis, J P Sloane, M Hartley, James D. Evans and Jiten Vora and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Gut and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

E. M. I. Williams

13 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

THE CLASSIFICATION OF CARCINOID TUMOURS 1963 2026 1984 2005 1963 200 400 600

Peers

E. M. I. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Epidemiology 692
  • Oncology 571
  • Neurology 492
  • Hematology 217
  • Nephrology 194
Replace Kate Burbury with:
Kate Burbury Australia
Maureen P. Neary United States
Sergio García‐Blas Spain
Bruce I. Shnider United States
Jan M. Griffin United States
Ran Luo China
Corrado Lodigiani Italy
Christopher Steer Australia
Maria Coco United States
Zhenguo Zhai China
Kate Burbury Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to E. M. I. Williams
E. M. I. Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to E. M. I. Williams
E. M. I. Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by E. M. I. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. I. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. I. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. I. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. I. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. I. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. I. Williams. The network helps show where E. M. I. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. M. I. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. M. I. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. M. I. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. M. I. Williams. E. M. I. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 25
2 29
3 4
4 37
5 69
6 90
7 27
8 139
9 8
10 4
11 61
12 335
13
THE CLASSIFICATION OF CARCINOID TUMOURS breakdown →
660

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026