E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Monique E. van LeerdamMargot G F van LierAnja WagnerErnst J. KuipersEwout W. SteyerbergEvelien DekkerG. N. J. TytgatCarel J.M. van Noesel
- Topics
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (7 papers)Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (4 papers)Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (3 papers)
- Journals
- GastroenterologyGutRadiology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsVietnamBelarus
In The Last Decade
E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen
25 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 738
- Oncology 579
- Surgery 481
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 328
- Cancer Research 167
Countries citing papers authored by E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen
This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen. The network helps show where E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen. E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Incidence of refeeding syndrome in internal medicine patients. | 45 |
| 2 | [Endobarrier: a unique but still premature concept]. | 1 |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 88 | |
| 6 | 333 | |
| 7 | 114 | |
| 8 | 165 | |
| 9 | 127 | |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | Richtlijn toedieningswegen en wijzen van enterale voeding op de intensive care | 0 |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 71 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen
E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Gastroenterology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (7 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (4 papers) and Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (738 citations), Gastroenterology (123 citations) and Oncology (579 citations). E. M. H. Mathus-Vliegen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Vietnam and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Monique E. van Leerdam, Margot G F van Lier, Anja Wagner, Ernst J. Kuipers, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Evelien Dekker, G. N. J. Tytgat, Carel J.M. van Noesel, Karam S. Boparai and Fokko M. Nagengast. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, Gut and Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.