E. Lourdel

500 total citations
27 papers, 340 citations indexed

About

E. Lourdel is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Lourdel has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 340 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 13 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in E. Lourdel's work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (12 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (11 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (11 papers). E. Lourdel is often cited by papers focused on Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (12 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (11 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (11 papers). E. Lourdel collaborates with scholars based in France. E. Lourdel's co-authors include Philippe Merviel, Henri Copin, A. Devaux, Rosalie Cabry, Moncef Benkhalifa, Jean Gondry, J. de Mouzon, Stéphanie Belloc, Bény Charbit and Sylvie Roche and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Fertility and Sterility and BioMed Research International.

In The Last Decade

E. Lourdel

26 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. Lourdel France 8 302 191 171 54 33 27 340
G. Grimbizis Greece 8 196 0.6× 200 1.0× 153 0.9× 50 0.9× 21 0.6× 10 293
Bei Xu China 10 323 1.1× 275 1.4× 176 1.0× 51 0.9× 57 1.7× 12 393
Fernando Neuspiller Spain 8 254 0.8× 231 1.2× 105 0.6× 57 1.1× 23 0.7× 16 311
Sari Pelkonen Finland 7 266 0.9× 263 1.4× 390 2.3× 75 1.4× 32 1.0× 11 470
Mohamed N. Mohesen Egypt 6 302 1.0× 270 1.4× 175 1.0× 25 0.5× 16 0.5× 8 355
Allison C. Petrini United States 10 184 0.6× 166 0.9× 195 1.1× 72 1.3× 29 0.9× 17 300
Jacob Rabinson Israel 14 425 1.4× 354 1.9× 221 1.3× 48 0.9× 71 2.2× 37 484
Irma Scholten Netherlands 7 268 0.9× 201 1.1× 134 0.8× 40 0.7× 12 0.4× 12 346
Eugenie M. Kaaijk Netherlands 11 268 0.9× 199 1.0× 148 0.9× 34 0.6× 26 0.8× 28 314
M. Toftager Denmark 6 467 1.5× 365 1.9× 257 1.5× 32 0.6× 47 1.4× 12 522

Countries citing papers authored by E. Lourdel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Lourdel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Lourdel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Lourdel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Lourdel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Lourdel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Lourdel. The network helps show where E. Lourdel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Lourdel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Lourdel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Lourdel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Lourdel. E. Lourdel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Merviel, Philippe, Sylvie Roche, Rosalie Cabry, et al.. (2022). Should intrauterine inseminations still be proposed in cases of unexplained infertility? Retrospective study and literature review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 305(5). 1241–1254. 7 indexed citations
2.
Belloc, Stéphanie, E. Lourdel, A. Devaux, et al.. (2017). Effect of Gonadotropin Types and Indications on Homologous Intrauterine Insemination Success: A Study from 1251 Cycles and a Review of the Literature. BioMed Research International. 2017. 1–12. 11 indexed citations
3.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2015). Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy. Reproductive Health. 12(1). 52–52. 26 indexed citations
4.
Cabry, Rosalie, E. Lourdel, Patrick R. Verhoest, et al.. (2013). Jusqu’où peut-on aller en don d’ovocytes ? Réflexions sur les risques des grossesses tardives. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 41(11). 672–677. 1 indexed citations
5.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2013). Intérêt actuel des selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM) dans l’endométriose. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 41(9). 524–528. 6 indexed citations
6.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2011). Peut-on réellement se passer de la cœlioscopie en cas d’infertilité a trompes normales en hystérosalpingographie ?. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 39(9). 504–508. 2 indexed citations
7.
Cabry, Rosalie, et al.. (2010). Physiopathology of human embryonic implantation: clinical incidences.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7 indexed citations
8.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2010). Physiopathology of human embryonic implantation: clinical incidences.. Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica. 47(5). S25–34. 13 indexed citations
9.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2010). Pour la pratique des inséminations intra-utérines après l’âge de 35ans chez la femme. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 38(4). 283–289. 1 indexed citations
10.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2010). Contre la pratique systématique d’une cœlioscopie dans le bilan d’une infertilité. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 38(6). 420–423. 4 indexed citations
11.
Lourdel, E., et al.. (2010). Évaluation des pratiques professionnelles dans un centre d’Assistance médicale à la procréation : comment améliorer la qualité des soins ?. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 38(10). 581–587. 3 indexed citations
13.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2009). Risques de la stimulation ovarienne et du prélèvement ovocytaire. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 37(11-12). 926–933. 6 indexed citations
14.
Lourdel, E., et al.. (2009). Épidémiologie du couple infertile. Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément. 38. F3–F7. 16 indexed citations
15.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2008). L’insuffisance ovarienne débutante : quels protocoles ?. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 36(9). 872–881. 3 indexed citations
16.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2008). Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): An analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature. Fertility and Sterility. 93(1). 79–88. 196 indexed citations
17.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2007). Contre l'obligation du transfert monoembryonnaire. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 35(5). 474–479. 6 indexed citations
18.
Lourdel, E., et al.. (2007). Utérus cloisonné: place de la septoplastie hystéroscopique. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 35(9). 811–818. 9 indexed citations
19.
Cabry, Rosalie, et al.. (2007). Prise en charge en induction de l'ovulation d'un cas de syndrome de Kallmann–De Morsier. Réflexions sur le rôle de la LH. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 35(6). 548–555. 2 indexed citations
20.
Merviel, Philippe, et al.. (2005). Le coasting et les protocoles de stimulation chez les hyperrépondeuses en AMP. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 33(9). 703–712. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026