Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Antimicrobial activity of mucosal-associated invariant T cells
2010682 citationsLionel Le Bourhis, Emmanuel Martin et al.Nature Immunologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of E Lévy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E Lévy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E Lévy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E Lévy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E Lévy. The network helps show where E Lévy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E Lévy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E Lévy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E Lévy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E Lévy. E Lévy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Parc, R, P Frileux, Emmanuel Tiret, et al.. (1989). [Acute necroticohemorrhagic pancreatitis. Why, when and how to drain? Apropos of 106 cases].. PubMed. 115(9). 651–6.2 indexed citations
Parc, R, E Lévy, & J Loygue. (1985). [Principles of surgery for peritonitis. Management of the peritoneum and digestive tract].. PubMed. 39(8). 541–6.2 indexed citations
12.
Lévy, E, R Parc, P H Cugnenc, et al.. (1984). [Fistulas of the small intestine with evisceration. New therapeutic approach. 120 cases].. PubMed. 13(24). 1491–4.2 indexed citations
13.
Lévy, E, L Hannoun, R Parc, et al.. (1984). [Prolonged active drainage of acute necrotico-hemorrhagic pancreatitis. Indications. Technics. Preliminary results. Apropos of 26 cases].. PubMed. 38(5). 351–6.3 indexed citations
Lévy, E, R Parc, P Błoch, et al.. (1982). [Transorificial intubation with direct neutralization of the digestive juices in cases of gastric or duodenal lesions. Principle and application of a new treatment for severe postoperative peritonitis of a gastric or duodenal origin (twenty-one cases) ].. PubMed. 36(6). 419–23.1 indexed citations
16.
Loygue, J, et al.. (1981). [Continuous-flow enteral hyperalimentation in the treatment of acute necrotic hemorrhagic pancreatitis (52 cases].. PubMed. 107(1). 64–6.1 indexed citations
17.
Parc, R, et al.. (1981). [Early post-operative complications in intestinal resections followed with colo-colitic or recto-colitic anastomoses. Clinical and biological manifestations of anastomotic complications. Therapeutic results about 523 cases (author's transl)].. PubMed. 35(2). 69–82.5 indexed citations
18.
Lévy, E, Jacques Cosnes, P Błoch, et al.. (1979). [Reinfusion of the upper digestive secretions into the lower part of the intestine decreases stomal flow from temporary enterostomies (author's transl)].. PubMed. 3(5). 447–51.4 indexed citations
19.
Loygue, J, et al.. (1978). [The continent ileostomy. Experience of 17 cases (author's transl)].. PubMed. 104(6). 512–6.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.