E. J. Wharton

32 total papers · 1.0k total citations
25 papers, 747 citations indexed

About

E. J. Wharton is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, E. J. Wharton has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 747 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 4 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in E. J. Wharton's work include Image Enhancement Techniques (9 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (9 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (9 papers). E. J. Wharton is often cited by papers focused on Image Enhancement Techniques (9 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (9 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (9 papers). E. J. Wharton collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. E. J. Wharton's co-authors include Karen Panetta, Sos С. Agaian, Jon A. McCleverty, Yicong Zhou, C. J. Winscom, N. M. Atherton, E. T. Shawl, T. A. STEPHENSON, Malcolm Gerloch and Alan Davison and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Inorganic Chemistry and Journal of Organometallic Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

E. J. Wharton

24 papers receiving 701 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
E. J. Wharton 466 213 148 92 83 25 747
Claire Mantel 156 0.3× 50 0.2× 156 1.1× 44 0.5× 119 1.4× 49 632
Tuo Li 198 0.4× 71 0.3× 140 0.9× 55 0.6× 13 0.2× 39 760
Cui‐Jin Li 109 0.2× 27 0.1× 351 2.4× 55 0.6× 468 5.6× 29 859
Thomas Huang 414 0.9× 140 0.7× 8 0.1× 118 1.3× 37 0.4× 25 737
Xing Huo 117 0.3× 90 0.4× 11 0.1× 578 6.3× 94 1.1× 47 863
Christina E. Rommel 74 0.2× 82 0.4× 13 0.1× 140 1.5× 8 0.1× 20 761
Jingyu Cui 331 0.7× 46 0.2× 7 0.0× 26 0.3× 7 0.1× 45 873
Fuhai Chen 326 0.7× 8 0.0× 39 0.3× 24 0.3× 32 0.4× 37 766
Kaiqiang Xu 137 0.3× 41 0.2× 42 0.3× 84 0.9× 34 0.4× 38 654
Haonan Lin 31 0.1× 51 0.2× 190 1.3× 21 0.2× 14 0.2× 37 844

Countries citing papers authored by E. J. Wharton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. J. Wharton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. J. Wharton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. J. Wharton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. J. Wharton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. J. Wharton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. J. Wharton. The network helps show where E. J. Wharton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. J. Wharton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. J. Wharton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. J. Wharton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. J. Wharton. E. J. Wharton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026