E. J. Hogue
- Plant Science top 1%
- Soil Science top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- G.H. NeilsenD. NeilsenT. ForgeP. ParchomchukFrank KappelBernie J. ZebarthPeter MillardD. J. Cantliffe
- Topics
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (53 papers)Horticultural and Viticultural Research (34 papers)Banana Cultivation and Research (13 papers)
In The Last Decade
E. J. Hogue
90 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Plant Science 1.5k
- Soil Science 513
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 263
- Ecology 215
- Agronomy and Crop Science 137
Countries citing papers authored by E. J. Hogue
This map shows the geographic impact of E. J. Hogue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. J. Hogue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. J. Hogue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. J. Hogue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. J. Hogue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. J. Hogue. The network helps show where E. J. Hogue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. J. Hogue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. J. Hogue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. J. Hogue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. J. Hogue. E. J. Hogue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | Demography of Montane Voles in Old Field and Orchard Habitats in Southern British Columbia | 9 |
| 6 | 49 | |
| 7 | The influence of orchard ground cover and introduced green lacewings on spring populations of western flower thrips in apple orchards | 3 |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 131 | |
| 10 | 80 | |
| 11 | 66 | |
| 12 | Improved rooting of Ottawa 3 apple rootstock by softwood cuttings using micropropagated plants as a cutting source | 0 |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | Effect of soil phosphorus levels on phosphate fractions in tomato leaves. | 93 |
About E. J. Hogue
E. J. Hogue is a scholar working on Plant Science, Soil Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 93 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (53 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (34 papers) and Banana Cultivation and Research (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (513 citations), Plant Science (1.5k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (263 citations). E. J. Hogue has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Poland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include G.H. Neilsen, D. Neilsen, T. Forge, P. Parchomchuk, Frank Kappel, Bernie J. Zebarth, Peter Millard, D. J. Cantliffe, Gerald E. Wilcox and Daniel J. Cantliffe. Their work appears in journals such as Plant and Soil, Tree Physiology and Applied Soil Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.