Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Ultrahigh resolution topographic mapping of Mars with MRO HiRISE stereo images: Meter‐scale slopes of candidate Phoenix landing sites
2008370 citationsR. L. Kirk, E. Howington‐Kraus et al.profile →
Citations per year, relative to E. Howington‐Kraus E. Howington‐Kraus (= 1×)
peers
M. R. Rosiek
Countries citing papers authored by E. Howington‐Kraus
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Howington‐Kraus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Howington‐Kraus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Howington‐Kraus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Howington‐Kraus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Howington‐Kraus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Howington‐Kraus. The network helps show where E. Howington‐Kraus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Howington‐Kraus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Howington‐Kraus.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Howington‐Kraus based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Howington‐Kraus. E. Howington‐Kraus is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kirk, R. L., E. Howington‐Kraus, T. M. Hare, & L. Jordá. (2015). The Effect of Incidence Angle on Stereo DTM Quality: Simulations in Support of Europa Exploration. AGUFM. 2015.3 indexed citations
2.
Howington‐Kraus, E., R. L. Fergason, R. L. Kirk, et al.. (2015). High-Resolution Topographic Mapping Supporting Selection of NASA's Next Mars Landing Sites. LPI. 2435.1 indexed citations
3.
Kirk, R. L., E. Howington‐Kraus, B. A. Archinal, L. Keszthelyi, & M. P. Golombek. (2012). Landers and Rovers Need High Resolution Topographic Maps: Lessons from the NASA Mars Exploration Program. LPICo. 1679. 4361.1 indexed citations
4.
Kirk, R. L., E. Howington‐Kraus, B. Redding, et al.. (2012). Topographic Mapping of Titan: Latest Results. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2759.7 indexed citations
5.
Mattson, S., R. L. Kirk, A. S. McEwen, et al.. (2011). Release of HiRISE Digital Terrain Models to the Planetary Data System. LPI. 1558.4 indexed citations
6.
Kirk, R. L., E. Howington‐Kraus, D. Galuszka, et al.. (2011). Near-complete 1-m topographic models of the MSL candidate landing sites: Site safety and quality evaluation. 2011. 1465.10 indexed citations
7.
Archinal, B. A., K. L. Edmundson, E. Howington‐Kraus, et al.. (2011). LROC DTM Comparison Effort. elib (German Aerospace Center). 2715.6 indexed citations
8.
Beyer, R. A., B. A. Archinal, K. L. Edmundson, et al.. (2010). LROC Stereo Data — Results of Initial Analysis. elib (German Aerospace Center). 2678.5 indexed citations
9.
Kirk, R. L., E. Howington‐Kraus, B. Redding, et al.. (2009). Three-Dimensional Views of Titan's Diverse Surface Features from Cassini RADAR Stereogrammetry. LPI. 1413.7 indexed citations
10.
Mattson, S., A. K. Boyd, R. L. Kirk, D. Cook, & E. Howington‐Kraus. (2009). HiJACK: Correcting spacecraft jitter in HiRISE images of Mars. 604.32 indexed citations
11.
Kirk, R. L. & E. Howington‐Kraus. (2008). Radargrammetry on three planets. The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. 37. 973–980.8 indexed citations
12.
Kirk, R. L., et al.. (2007). Topography of Titan from Cassini RADAR Stereo Data. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007.1 indexed citations
13.
Archinal, B. A., M. G. Tomasko, B. Rizk, et al.. (2006). Topographic Mapping of the Huygens Landing Site on Titan: New Results and Error Analyses. 37th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2089.1 indexed citations
14.
Skinner, J. A., L. R. Gaddis, L. Keszthelyi, et al.. (2005). Alphonsus-type Dark-Halo Craters -- Morphometry and Volume Reassessments and Implications for Eruptive Style. 36th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2344.1 indexed citations
15.
Kirk, R. L., B. A. Archinal, M. G. Tomasko, et al.. (2005). Topographic Mapping of the Huygens Landing Site on Titan. DPS.2 indexed citations
16.
Kirk, R. L., E. Howington‐Kraus, B. Redding, et al.. (2003). High-Resolution Topomapping of Candidate MER Landing Sites with MOC: New Results and Error Analyses. LPI. 1966.4 indexed citations
17.
Howington‐Kraus, E., R. L. Kirk, D. Galuszka, T. M. Hare, & B. Redding. (2002). Validation of the USGS Magellan Sensor Model for Topographic Mapping of Venus. LPI. 1986.2 indexed citations
18.
Kirk, R. L., E. Howington‐Kraus, & B. A. Archinal. (2002). Topographic Analysis of Candidate Mars Exploration Rover Landing Sites from MOC Narrow Angle Stereoimages. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1988.5 indexed citations
19.
Kirk, R. L., K. J. Becker, D. Cook, et al.. (1999). Revision of the Mars Control Net and Global Digital Image Mosaic. 6218.1 indexed citations
20.
Howington‐Kraus, E., et al.. (1994). Magellan Radar Data for Venus Topographic Mapping. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1519.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.