Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Ultrahigh resolution topographic mapping of Mars with MRO HiRISE stereo images: Meter‐scale slopes of candidate Phoenix landing sites
2008370 citationsR. L. Kirk, E. Howington‐Kraus et al.Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheresprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Cook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Cook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Cook more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Cook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Cook. The network helps show where D. Cook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Cook
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Cook.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Cook based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. Cook. D. Cook is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Keszthelyi, L., T. Becker, S. Sides, et al.. (2013). Support and Future Vision for the Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers (ISIS). Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2546.15 indexed citations
Mattson, S., A. K. Boyd, R. L. Kirk, D. Cook, & E. Howington‐Kraus. (2009). HiJACK: Correcting spacecraft jitter in HiRISE images of Mars. 604.32 indexed citations
6.
Kirk, R. L., E. Howington‐Kraus, M. R. Rosiek, et al.. (2008). Ultrahigh resolution topographic mapping of Mars with MRO HiRISE stereo images: Meter‐scale slopes of candidate Phoenix landing sites. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 113(E3).370 indexed citations breakdown →
Archinal, B. A., M. G. Tomasko, B. Rizk, et al.. (2006). Topographic Mapping of the Huygens Landing Site on Titan: New Results and Error Analyses. 37th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2089.1 indexed citations
9.
Kirk, R. L., B. A. Archinal, M. G. Tomasko, et al.. (2005). Topographic Mapping of the Huygens Landing Site on Titan. DPS.2 indexed citations
10.
Archinal, B. A., et al.. (2004). A new Mars Digital Image Model (MDIM 2.1) control network. 35. 863–868.7 indexed citations
11.
Archinal, B. A., et al.. (2003). Mars Digital Image Model 2.1 Control Network. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1485.9 indexed citations
12.
Archinal, B. A., et al.. (2003). Mars Digital Image Model (MDIM) 2.1 control network.6 indexed citations
13.
Archinal, B. A., T. R. Colvin, Merton E. Davies, et al.. (2002). A MOLA-controlled RAND-USGS Control Network for Mars. 1632.2 indexed citations
14.
Kirk, R. L., K. J. Becker, D. Cook, et al.. (1999). Revision of the Mars Control Net and Global Digital Image Mosaic. 6218.1 indexed citations
Becker, T. L., D. Cook, E. M. Eliason, et al.. (1997). Clementine UVVIS Multispectral Processing. LPI. 797.1 indexed citations
18.
Gaddis, L. R., K. J. Becker, T. Becker, et al.. (1997). An Overview of the Integrated Software for Imaging Spectrometers (ISIS). Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 387.86 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.