E. F. Riek
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Paleontology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael Hubbard
- Topics
- Fossil Insects in Amber (33 papers)Plant and animal studies (22 papers)Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (20 papers)
- Journals
- Australian Journal of ZoologyRecords of the Australian MuseumPsyche A Journal of Entomology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCzechiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
E. F. Riek
63 papers receiving 921 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 692
- Ecology 462
- Genetics 260
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 224
- Paleontology 192
Countries citing papers authored by E. F. Riek
This map shows the geographic impact of E. F. Riek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. F. Riek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. F. Riek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. F. Riek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. F. Riek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. F. Riek. The network helps show where E. F. Riek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. F. Riek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. F. Riek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. F. Riek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. F. Riek. E. F. Riek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Name for a Triassic Mayfly from South Africa | 1 |
| 2 | A new collection of insects from the Upper Triassic of South Africa | 134 |
| 3 | New Upper Permian insects from Natal, South Africa | 42 |
| 4 | An unusual mayfly (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from the Triassic of South Africa | 4 |
| 5 | A new Strepsipteron from Natal (Insecta: Halictophagidae) | 4 |
| 6 | BIOLOGICAL NOTE ON THE ACRIDID GRASSHOPPER STENACRIS-VITREIPENNIS-VITREIPENNIS INSECTA ORTHOPTERA | 1 |
| 7 | A FOSSIL INSECT FROM THE DWYKA SERIES OF RHODESIA | 5 |
| 8 | Fossil insects from the Upper Permian of Natal, South Africa | 24 |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About E. F. Riek
E. F. Riek is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Paleontology and Genetics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fossil Insects in Amber (33 papers), Plant and animal studies (22 papers) and Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (692 citations), Paleontology (192 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (224 citations). E. F. Riek has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Hubbard. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Zoology, Records of the Australian Museum and Psyche A Journal of Entomology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.