E. Boven

924 citations
25 papers · 770 indexed · h-index 11

E. Boven

25 papers receiving 742 citations

Peers

E. Boven
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Oncology 503
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 58
  • Family Practice 24
  • Toxicology 31
  • Pharmacology 57
Replace Femke M. de Man with:
Femke M. de Man Netherlands
Sachin Shah United States
Nora Manoukian Forones Brazil
Patrick J. Medina United States
Òren Smaletz Brazil
Jill Kolesar United States
Chun Ho Ngai Hong Kong
Sojiro Kusumoto Japan
E Warner Canada
Barbara G. Lubejko United States
E. Boven relative to Femke M. de Man Netherlands Femke M. de Man's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Femke M. de Man · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Boven

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Boven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Boven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Boven more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Boven

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Boven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Boven. The network helps show where E. Boven may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Boven, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Boven Line = papers co-authored together E. Boven links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20211
2 2011103
3 20101
4
PHASE I STUDY TO ASSESS THE SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF SARACATINIB (AZD0530) PLUS CARBOPLATIN (C) AND/OR PACLITAXEL (P) IN PATIENTS WITH SOLID TUMOURS
20101
5 20097
6 20092
7 20072
8
FOLFOX3 in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
20042
9 19992
10
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lobaplatin (D-19466) in patients with advanced solid tumors, including patients with impaired renal of liver function.
199939
11 199881
12 199847
13 19973
14 1997103
15 199715
16 199518
17 19959
18 199410
19
[The hematopoietic growth factor GM-CSF in chemotherapy for advanced breast carcinoma].
19914
20 1988156

About E. Boven

E. Boven is a scholar working on Oncology, Hematology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (6 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (4 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (4 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (503 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (58 citations) and Family Practice (24 citations). E. Boven has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Herbert M. Pinedo, Giuseppe Giaccone, H.E. Gall, W J van der Vijgh, K. Mross, Paul A. Maessen, Boudewijn J.M. Braakhuis, Godefridus J. Peters, Veronique W.T. Ruiz van Haperen and G. Veerman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, International Journal of Cancer, British Journal of Cancer and European Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026