Drew Wright

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
66 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Drew Wright is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Surgery and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Drew Wright has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 11 papers in Surgery and 11 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Drew Wright's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (27 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (5 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers). Drew Wright is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (27 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (5 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers). Drew Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Drew Wright's co-authors include Peggy B. Leung, Madeline R. Sterling, Tara F. Bishop, Jessica S. Ancker, David K. Vawdrey, Natalie C. Benda, Lisa Grossman Liu, Ruth Masterson Creber, Ajay Gupta and Hediyeh Baradaran and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Drew Wright

61 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

The Use of Social Media in Graduate Medical Education: A ... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Drew Wright United States 14 294 237 212 205 195 66 1.1k
Dejana Braithwaite United States 27 305 1.0× 301 1.3× 71 0.3× 241 1.2× 397 2.0× 59 2.5k
Marien González‐Lorenzo Italy 19 294 1.0× 61 0.3× 50 0.2× 270 1.3× 176 0.9× 42 1.6k
Jamie Roberts United States 11 239 0.8× 154 0.6× 111 0.5× 85 0.4× 252 1.3× 24 941
Armin D. Weinberg United States 23 346 1.2× 201 0.8× 84 0.4× 217 1.1× 340 1.7× 73 1.7k
Brooke Nickel Australia 25 667 2.3× 162 0.7× 49 0.2× 173 0.8× 273 1.4× 94 2.1k
Jamie C. Sergeant United Kingdom 25 153 0.5× 241 1.0× 91 0.4× 102 0.5× 111 0.6× 79 1.6k
Carol P. Somkin United States 27 519 1.8× 157 0.7× 45 0.2× 308 1.5× 469 2.4× 50 2.1k
Mina S. Sedrak United States 21 326 1.1× 417 1.8× 35 0.2× 225 1.1× 391 2.0× 104 2.0k
Pamela Ganschow United States 17 341 1.2× 114 0.5× 54 0.3× 69 0.3× 206 1.1× 36 1.1k
Joy H. Lewis United States 14 368 1.3× 215 0.9× 60 0.3× 165 0.8× 407 2.1× 48 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Drew Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Drew Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drew Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drew Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Drew Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Drew Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Drew Wright. The network helps show where Drew Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Drew Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Drew Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Drew Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Drew Wright. Drew Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rutherford, Helena J. V., et al.. (2025). Operationalizing psychological trauma in pregnancy: A systematic review.. Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy. 18(1). 1–9. 1 indexed citations
2.
Wright, Drew, Vivek Kumbhari, Shelby Sullivan, et al.. (2025). Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for the Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obesity Surgery. 35(6). 2092–2100.
3.
Maayan, Omri, et al.. (2024). Treatments and interventions addressing chronic somatic pain in torture survivors: A systematic review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(3). e0003070–e0003070. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wright, Drew, et al.. (2024). Music interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 100053–100053. 1 indexed citations
5.
Atalay, Başar, et al.. (2023). Natural History of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurgery. 176. e634–e643. 5 indexed citations
6.
Demetres, Michelle, et al.. (2023). A decade of systematic reviews: an assessment of Weill Cornell Medicine's systematic review service. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 111(3). 728–733. 7 indexed citations
7.
Datta, S., et al.. (2023). Systematic Review of Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Interventional Radiology. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 20(8). 752–757. 2 indexed citations
8.
Ottwell, Ryan, et al.. (2022). The presence of spin in systematic reviews focused on diabetic neuropathy: A cross-sectional analysis. PLoS ONE. 17(9). e0274744–e0274744. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ottwell, Ryan, Micah Hartwell, Brad J. White, et al.. (2022). Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses relating to postoperative nausea and vomiting. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 39(8). 701–710. 1 indexed citations
10.
Ottwell, Ryan, et al.. (2022). Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 12(8). e049421–e049421. 2 indexed citations
11.
Ottwell, Ryan, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses focused on treatments of alcohol use disorder. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 47(4). 476–485. 1 indexed citations
12.
Albert, Paul, Jie Lin, Michael E. Bales, et al.. (2021). ReCiter: An open source, identity-driven, authorship prediction algorithm optimized for academic institutions. PLoS ONE. 16(4). e0244641–e0244641. 5 indexed citations
13.
Ottwell, Ryan, et al.. (2021). Evaluating Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Cannabis use Disorder. Substance Abuse. 43(1). 380–388. 2 indexed citations
14.
Robinson, N. Bryce, Ajita Naik, Mohamed Rahouma, et al.. (2021). Sex differences in outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 33(6). 841–847. 41 indexed citations
16.
Cho, Ahra, et al.. (2020). A Systematic Review of Postoperative Delirium in the Urologic Patient. Current Urology Reports. 21(12). 60–60. 3 indexed citations
17.
Demetres, Michelle, Drew Wright, & Antonio P. DeRosa. (2020). Burnout among medical and health sciences information professionals who support systematic reviews: an exploratory study. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 108(1). 89–97. 12 indexed citations
19.
Wright, Drew, et al.. (1998). A community outbreak of invasive and non-invasive group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal disease in a town in South Wales. Epidemiology and Infection. 121(3). 515–521. 8 indexed citations
20.
Wright, Drew. (1951). Endarteriectomy for Chronic Endarteritis. BMJ. 2(4723). 95–95.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026