Douglas W. Vick

477 total citations
19 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

Douglas W. Vick is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Douglas W. Vick has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Law, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Douglas W. Vick's work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (2 papers) and Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 papers). Douglas W. Vick is often cited by papers focused on Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (2 papers) and Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 papers). Douglas W. Vick collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and India. Douglas W. Vick's co-authors include Bijoyendra Bera, Sushanta K. Mitra, Marek Malac, Kevin Campbell, Naga Siva Kumar Gunda, Andrew Murray, Gillian Doyle, Prashant Shekhar, Zubin Jacob and Michael J. Brett and has published in prestigious journals such as Langmuir, Optics Express and Ultramicroscopy.

In The Last Decade

Douglas W. Vick

18 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Douglas W. Vick
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Mechanics of Materials 109
  • Ocean Engineering 97
  • Mechanical Engineering 61
  • Biomedical Engineering 34
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 28
Replace A. T. Watson with:
A. T. Watson Canada
Anthony Forsyth Australia
Xiaojie Wang China
Robert L. Hirsch United States
Ebubekir Kaplan Türkiye
G. Chen China
Thomas L. Harper United States
Christer Gustafsson Sweden
Robert D. Benson United States
Shucheng Wang China
A. T. Watson Canada View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Douglas W. Vick
Douglas W. Vick · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Douglas W. Vick
Douglas W. Vick · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas W. Vick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas W. Vick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas W. Vick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas W. Vick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas W. Vick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas W. Vick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas W. Vick. The network helps show where Douglas W. Vick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas W. Vick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas W. Vick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas W. Vick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas W. Vick. Douglas W. Vick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 10
3 23
4 12
5 33
6 133
7 14
8 10
9 12
10 13
11
The Human Rights Act and the British Constitution
9
12 4
13 4
14 2
15 18
16 3
17 6
18
An opportunity lost: The United Kingdom's failed reform of defamation law
2
19 2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026