Douglas L. Oliver
- Sensory Systems top 0.02%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Neurology top 1%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Co-authors
- D. Kent MorestDeborah C. BishopGretchen E. BeckiusAmiram ShneidermanTetsufumi ItoShobhana SivaramakrishnanCraig K. HenkelManuel S. Malmierca
- Topics
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (61 papers)Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (27 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (25 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanSpain
In The Last Decade
Douglas L. Oliver
146 papers receiving 5.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
- Sensory Systems 3.4k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.4k
- Neurology 802
- Nutrition and Dietetics 531
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas L. Oliver
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas L. Oliver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas L. Oliver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas L. Oliver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas L. Oliver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas L. Oliver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas L. Oliver. The network helps show where Douglas L. Oliver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas L. Oliver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas L. Oliver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas L. Oliver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas L. Oliver. Douglas L. Oliver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 96 | |
| 10 | 100 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 79 | |
| 13 | 96 | |
| 14 | 165 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 181 | |
| 17 | 296 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | Studies in the anthropology of Bougainville, Solomon Islands | 7 |
| 20 | 49 |
About Douglas L. Oliver
Douglas L. Oliver is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 155 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (61 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (27 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (3.4k citations), Developmental Biology (452 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (3.1k citations). Douglas L. Oliver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Spain. Frequent co-authors include D. Kent Morest, Deborah C. Bishop, Gretchen E. Beckius, Amiram Shneiderman, Tetsufumi Ito, Shobhana Sivaramakrishnan, Craig K. Henkel, Manuel S. Malmierca, William C. Hall and J. N. Chung. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.