Douglas J. DeFrees

9.2k citations
21 papers · 8.3k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 16

Douglas J. DeFrees

20 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Hit Papers

Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XXIII. A polar...198220261996201119822.0k4.0k6.0k

Peers

Douglas J. DeFrees
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Organic Chemistry 3.3k
  • Materials Chemistry 2.4k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.3k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 1.7k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.4k
Replace Günther W. Spitznagel with:
Günther W. Spitznagel Germany
G. S. Chandler Australia
Christoph Kölmel Germany
Michael Bär Germany
James D. Patterson United States
Harold Basch Israel
Eolo Scrocco Italy
Andrew Streitwieser United States
Karin Eichkorn Germany
I. Mayer Hungary
Douglas J. DeFrees relative to Günther W. Spitznagel Germany Günther W. Spitznagel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Günther W. Spitznagel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas J. DeFrees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas J. DeFrees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas J. DeFrees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas J. DeFrees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas J. DeFrees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas J. DeFrees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas J. DeFrees. The network helps show where Douglas J. DeFrees may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas J. DeFrees

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas J. DeFrees. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas J. DeFrees based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas J. DeFrees. Douglas J. DeFrees is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 15
2 22
3 28
4 50
5 1
6 5
7
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XXIII. A polarization-type basis set for second-row elementsbreakdown →
7336
8 108
9 101
10 64
11 52
12 128
13 187
14 16
15 17
16 35
17 2
18 38
19 35
20 4

About Douglas J. DeFrees

Douglas J. DeFrees is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Filtration and Separation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 8.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (7 papers) and Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.4k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (1.7k citations) and Organic Chemistry (3.3k citations). Douglas J. DeFrees has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Croatia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Warren J. Hehre, John A. Pople, J. Stephen Binkley, William J. Pietro, Michelle Francl, Mark S. Gordon, Robert T. McIver, Beverly A. Levi, Steven K. Pollack and Wolfram Koch. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Chemical Physics and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026