Douglas C. Fredericks
- Surgery top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Rheumatology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Joseph D. SmuckerEmily PetersenJames V. NepolaNicole M. GroslandJames A. MartinJoan AbbottAnup GandhiJessica E. Goetz
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (24 papers)Bone fractures and treatments (15 papers)Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (12 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanRussia
In The Last Decade
Douglas C. Fredericks
73 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Surgery 728
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 360
- Biomedical Engineering 323
- Rheumatology 250
- Molecular Biology 199
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas C. Fredericks
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas C. Fredericks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas C. Fredericks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas C. Fredericks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas C. Fredericks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas C. Fredericks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas C. Fredericks. The network helps show where Douglas C. Fredericks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas C. Fredericks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas C. Fredericks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas C. Fredericks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas C. Fredericks. Douglas C. Fredericks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 84 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 62 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | The effect of multi-level laminoplasty and laminectomy on the biomechanics of the cervical spine: a finite element study. | 23 |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Douglas C. Fredericks
Douglas C. Fredericks is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Surgery, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (24 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (15 papers) and Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (360 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (148 citations) and Rheumatology (250 citations). Douglas C. Fredericks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph D. Smucker, Emily Petersen, James V. Nepola, Nicole M. Grosland, James A. Martin, Joan Abbott, Anup Gandhi, Jessica E. Goetz, Todd O. McKinley and Bruce J. Simon. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.