Douglas A. Van Belle
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Development top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Richard Stuart OlsonA. Cooper DruryJenifer Whitten‐WoodringThomas JamiesonDavid M. PotterSteven W. HookSteven Livingston
- Topics
- Political Conflict and Governance (6 papers)International Development and Aid (6 papers)Media Influence and Politics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandCanada
In The Last Decade
Douglas A. Van Belle
24 papers receiving 531 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Sociology and Political Science 422
- Development 193
- Political Science and International Relations 179
- Communication 123
- Strategy and Management 102
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas A. Van Belle
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas A. Van Belle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas A. Van Belle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas A. Van Belle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas A. Van Belle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas A. Van Belle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas A. Van Belle. The network helps show where Douglas A. Van Belle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas A. Van Belle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas A. Van Belle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas A. Van Belle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas A. Van Belle. Douglas A. Van Belle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 56 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 143 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | The influence of news coverage on Japanese foreign development aid | 5 |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 58 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 60 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Douglas A. Van Belle
Douglas A. Van Belle is a scholar working on Development, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (6 papers), International Development and Aid (6 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (193 citations), Communication (123 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (422 citations). Douglas A. Van Belle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard Stuart Olson, A. Cooper Drury, Jenifer Whitten‐Woodring, Thomas Jamieson, David M. Potter, Steven W. Hook and Steven Livingston. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, The Journal of Politics and International Studies Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.