Dory Sample
- Oncology top 10%
- Otorhinolaryngology top 2%
- Surgery
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research
- Co-authors
- Patti HankinsBruno D. FornageNicholas H. A. TerryTerry L. SmithAdel K. El-NaggarRobert M. ByersYa-Yen LeeStimson P. Schantz
- Topics
- Celiac Disease Research and Management (3 papers)Microscopic Colitis (2 papers)DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dory Sample
12 papers receiving 529 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Oncology 239
- Otorhinolaryngology 228
- Surgery 174
- Molecular Biology 161
- Cancer Research 133
Countries citing papers authored by Dory Sample
This map shows the geographic impact of Dory Sample's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dory Sample with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dory Sample more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dory Sample
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dory Sample. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dory Sample. The network helps show where Dory Sample may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dory Sample
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dory Sample. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dory Sample based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dory Sample. Dory Sample is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 61 | |
| 6 | Post-study aspirin intake and factors motivating participation in a colorectal cancer chemoprevention trial. | 14 |
| 7 | A dose-finding study of aspirin for chemoprevention utilizing rectal mucosal prostaglandin E(2) levels as a biomarker. | 40 |
| 8 | 238 | |
| 9 | Hospice: one choice for the end-stage head and neck cancer patient. | 2 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Association between family history of cancer and mutagen sensitivity in upper aerodigestive tract cancer patients. | 52 |
| 12 | Mutagen sensitivity in upper aerodigestive tract cancer: a case-control analysis. | 89 |
About Dory Sample
Dory Sample is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Otorhinolaryngology and Cancer Research, having authored 12 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Celiac Disease Research and Management (3 papers), Microscopic Colitis (2 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (228 citations), Cancer Research (133 citations) and Oncology (239 citations). Dory Sample has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patti Hankins, Bruno D. Fornage, Nicholas H. A. Terry, Terry L. Smith, Adel K. El-Naggar, Robert M. Byers, Ya-Yen Lee, Stimson P. Schantz, Susan Halabi and M R Spitz. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, Digestive Diseases and Sciences and Head & Neck.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.