Dorothee Stanneck

2.0k total citations
42 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Dorothee Stanneck is a scholar working on Parasitology, Infectious Diseases and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Dorothee Stanneck has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Parasitology, 28 papers in Infectious Diseases and 19 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Dorothee Stanneck's work include Vector-borne infectious diseases (27 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (19 papers) and Viral Infections and Vectors (15 papers). Dorothee Stanneck is often cited by papers focused on Vector-borne infectious diseases (27 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (19 papers) and Viral Infections and Vectors (15 papers). Dorothee Stanneck collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United States. Dorothee Stanneck's co-authors include Domenico Otranto, Norbert Mencke, Josephus Fourie, Gioia Capelli, Filipe Dantas‐Torres, Maria Stefanía Latrofa, Gabriella Testini, Donato de Caprariis, Ivan G. Horak and Petr Volf and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

In The Last Decade

Dorothee Stanneck

42 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dorothee Stanneck Germany 25 1.0k 841 656 471 327 42 1.6k
Rosa Gálvez Spain 22 582 0.6× 449 0.5× 953 1.5× 209 0.4× 452 1.4× 46 1.3k
Luciana Aguiar Figueredo Italy 21 522 0.5× 517 0.6× 351 0.5× 239 0.5× 634 1.9× 48 1.3k
David H. Walker United States 23 1.2k 1.2× 861 1.0× 538 0.8× 158 0.3× 66 0.2× 43 1.4k
Yaarit Nachum‐Biala Israel 25 1.1k 1.1× 891 1.1× 490 0.7× 96 0.2× 237 0.7× 89 1.5k
Joseph Singleton United States 16 973 1.0× 817 1.0× 353 0.5× 175 0.4× 48 0.1× 26 1.1k
Ewa Cisak Poland 21 764 0.8× 683 0.8× 289 0.4× 125 0.3× 64 0.2× 53 1.1k
Renate Edelhofer Austria 19 1.1k 1.1× 471 0.6× 143 0.2× 84 0.2× 314 1.0× 30 1.2k
D. H. Walker United States 6 1.2k 1.2× 982 1.2× 192 0.3× 203 0.4× 45 0.1× 7 1.3k
Dietmar Hamel Germany 20 879 0.9× 712 0.8× 154 0.2× 154 0.3× 73 0.2× 55 1.1k
W J Simpson United States 20 654 0.7× 742 0.9× 416 0.6× 186 0.4× 78 0.2× 29 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Dorothee Stanneck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dorothee Stanneck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorothee Stanneck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorothee Stanneck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dorothee Stanneck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorothee Stanneck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorothee Stanneck. The network helps show where Dorothee Stanneck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dorothee Stanneck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dorothee Stanneck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dorothee Stanneck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dorothee Stanneck. Dorothee Stanneck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Krämer, Friederike, Katrin Deuster, Byron L. Blagburn, et al.. (2019). Prevention of transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum by Ixodes spp. ticks to dogs treated with the Seresto® collar (imidacloprid 10% + flumethrin 4.5%). Parasitology Research. 119(1). 299–315. 16 indexed citations
2.
Brianti, Emanuele, Ettore Napoli, Gabriella Gaglio, et al.. (2016). Field Evaluation of Two Different Treatment Approaches and Their Ability to Control Fleas and Prevent Canine Leishmaniosis in a Highly Endemic Area. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 10(9). e0004987–e0004987. 47 indexed citations
3.
Ramos, Rafael Antonio Nascimento, Alessio Giannelli, Riccardo Paolo Lia, et al.. (2014). Incidence of Cercopithifilaria bainae in Dogs and Probability of Co-Infection with Other Tick-Borne Pathogens. PLoS ONE. 9(2). e88198–e88198. 16 indexed citations
4.
Otranto, Domenico, Filipe Dantas‐Torres, Donato de Caprariis, et al.. (2013). Prevention of Canine Leishmaniosis in a Hyper-Endemic Area Using a Combination of 10% Imidacloprid/4.5% Flumethrin. PLoS ONE. 8(2). e56374–e56374. 51 indexed citations
5.
Dantas‐Torres, Filipe, Gioia Capelli, Alessio Giannelli, et al.. (2013). Efficacy of an imidacloprid/flumethrin collar against fleas, ticks and tick-borne pathogens in dogs. Parasites & Vectors. 6(1). 245–245. 47 indexed citations
6.
Lappin, Michael R., et al.. (2013). A flea and tick collar containing 10% imidacloprid and 4.5% flumethrin prevents flea transmission of Bartonella henselae in cats. Parasites & Vectors. 6(1). 26–26. 38 indexed citations
8.
Fourie, Josephus, Dorothee Stanneck, H. G. Luus, et al.. (2013). Transmission of Ehrlichia canis by Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks feeding on dogs and on artificial membranes. Veterinary Parasitology. 197(3-4). 595–603. 85 indexed citations
9.
Stanneck, Dorothee, et al.. (2012). Efficacy of an imidacloprid/flumethrin collar against fleas and ticks on cats. Parasites & Vectors. 5(1). 82–82. 27 indexed citations
11.
Stanneck, Dorothee, et al.. (2012). Efficacy of an imidacloprid/flumethrin collar against fleas, ticks, mites and lice on dogs. Parasites & Vectors. 5(1). 102–102. 48 indexed citations
12.
Fourie, Josephus, Dorothee Stanneck, & Frans Jongejan. (2012). Prevention of transmission of Babesia canis by Dermacentor reticulatus ticks to dogs treated with an imidacloprid/flumethrin collar. Veterinary Parasitology. 192(1-3). 273–278. 34 indexed citations
13.
Otranto, Domenico, Filipe Dantas‐Torres, Stefania Weigl, et al.. (2011). Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and PCR. Parasites & Vectors. 4(1). 55–55. 108 indexed citations
14.
Caprariis, Donato de, Filipe Dantas‐Torres, Gioia Capelli, et al.. (2010). Evolution of clinical, haematological and biochemical findings in young dogs naturally infected by vector-borne pathogens. Veterinary Microbiology. 149(1-2). 206–212. 60 indexed citations
15.
Otranto, Domenico, Benedetta de Caprariis, Riccardo Paolo Lia, et al.. (2010). Prevention of endemic canine vector-borne diseases using imidacloprid 10% and permethrin 50% in young dogs: A longitudinal field study. Veterinary Parasitology. 172(3-4). 323–332. 80 indexed citations
16.
Rohoušová, Iva, et al.. (2008). Kinetics of Canine Antibody Response to Saliva of the Sand Fly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 8(4). 443–450. 53 indexed citations
17.
18.
Fourie, L.J., Dorothee Stanneck, & Ivan G. Horak. (2003). The efficacy of collars impregnated with flumethrin and propoxur against experimental infestations of adult Rhipicephalus sanguineus on dogs. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association. 74(4). 123–126. 12 indexed citations
19.
Mencke, Norbert, Petr Volf, Věra Volfová, & Dorothee Stanneck. (2003). Repellent efficacy of a combination containing imidacloprid and permethrin against sand flies ( Phlebotomus papatasi ) in dogs. Parasitology Research. 90(0). S108–S111. 59 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026