Dorit Schöller

15 papers receiving 109 citations

Peers

Dorit Schöller
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 75
  • Transplantation 17
  • Urology 16
  • Reproductive Medicine 18
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 33
Replace Elisa Restelli with:
Elisa Restelli Italy
Eleonora Fontana Italy
G Girschick Germany
Raminta Baušytė Lithuania
Félix Boria Spain
Carol Gardiner United Kingdom
Nicole F. Klijn Netherlands
Bonilla Nayar India
António Setúbal Portugal
Akira Namba Japan
Dorit Schöller relative to Elisa Restelli Italy Elisa Restelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elisa Restelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dorit Schöller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dorit Schöller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorit Schöller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorit Schöller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dorit Schöller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorit Schöller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorit Schöller. The network helps show where Dorit Schöller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dorit Schöller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dorit Schöller Line = papers co-authored together Dorit Schöller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201931
2 201714
3 201714
4 20218
5 20178
6 20227
7 20186
8 20175
9 20215
10 20204
11 20184
12
Experiences of a multistep process with medical and psychological interventions for patients with congenital uterine aplasia to achieve motherhood: the Gothenburg-Tübingen collaboration.
20192
13 20172
14 20181
15 20161
16 20210

About Dorit Schöller

Dorit Schöller is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 112 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gynecological conditions and treatments (10 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (3 papers), Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research (3 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (75 citations), Transplantation (17 citations), Urology (16 citations), Reproductive Medicine (18 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (33 citations). Dorit Schöller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Katharina Rall, D. Wallwiener, Sara Y. Brucker, Birgitt Schönfisch, Melanie Henes, Christl Reisenauer, Florin‐Andrei Taran, Simone Eisenbeis, Bernhard Krämer and Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Journal of Clinical Medicine, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact