Doris Pierce

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
41 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Doris Pierce is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Psychiatry and Mental health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Doris Pierce has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Occupational Therapy, 7 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Doris Pierce's work include Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (24 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers) and Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (5 papers). Doris Pierce is often cited by papers focused on Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (24 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (7 papers) and Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (5 papers). Doris Pierce collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Thailand. Doris Pierce's co-authors include Florence Clark, Gelya Frank, Jeanne Jackson, Michael Carlson, Robert James Wolfe, Diane Parham, Ruth Zemke, Dana Howell, Christine Myers and Loree A. Primeau and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Qualitative Research and International Journal of Social Research Methodology.

In The Last Decade

Doris Pierce

40 papers receiving 958 citations

Hit Papers

Occupational Science: Academic Innovation in the Service ... 1991 2026 2002 2014 1991 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Doris Pierce United States 16 767 411 207 170 147 41 1.1k
Barbara A. Boyt Schell United States 9 626 0.8× 344 0.8× 166 0.8× 129 0.8× 77 0.5× 25 1.0k
Elizabeth J. Yerxa United States 22 1.2k 1.6× 607 1.5× 227 1.1× 300 1.8× 165 1.1× 45 1.8k
Ruth Humphry United States 16 433 0.6× 315 0.8× 299 1.4× 88 0.5× 87 0.6× 39 988
Betty Risteen Hasselkus United States 20 432 0.6× 341 0.8× 189 0.9× 99 0.6× 188 1.3× 59 1.1k
Jim Hinojosa United States 20 450 0.6× 526 1.3× 462 2.2× 126 0.7× 61 0.4× 71 1.3k
Karen R. Whalley Hammell Canada 14 523 0.7× 319 0.8× 175 0.8× 81 0.5× 113 0.8× 19 879
Janice Posatery Burke United States 17 475 0.6× 633 1.5× 356 1.7× 89 0.5× 94 0.6× 36 1.5k
Charlotte Brasic Royeen United States 18 383 0.5× 318 0.8× 219 1.1× 84 0.5× 56 0.4× 90 1.1k
Ferol Menks Ludwig United States 8 420 0.5× 178 0.4× 103 0.5× 77 0.5× 68 0.5× 10 621
Suzanne M. Peloquin United States 16 403 0.5× 177 0.4× 184 0.9× 63 0.4× 43 0.3× 41 664

Countries citing papers authored by Doris Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doris Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doris Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doris Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doris Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doris Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doris Pierce. The network helps show where Doris Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Doris Pierce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Doris Pierce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Doris Pierce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Doris Pierce. Doris Pierce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pierce, Doris. (2024). Occupational Science for Occupational Therapy. 3 indexed citations
2.
Hocking, Clare, et al.. (2017). Research as relationship: engaging with ethical intent. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 20(3). 285–298. 6 indexed citations
3.
Marshall, Amy D., Christine Myers, & Doris Pierce. (2016). A Century of Therapeutic Use of the Physical Environment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 71(1). 7101100030p1–7101100030p10. 2 indexed citations
4.
Clair, Valerie Wright‐St, et al.. (2013). Cross-Cultural Understandings of Festival Food-Related Activities for Older Women in Chiang Mai, Thailand, Eastern Kentucky, USA and Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. 28(2). 103–119. 6 indexed citations
5.
Marshall, Amy D., et al.. (2012). Youth and administrator perspectives on transition in Kentucky's state agency schools.. PubMed. 91(2). 95–116. 3 indexed citations
6.
Pierce, Doris. (2012). Promise. Journal of Occupational Science. 19(4). 298–311. 29 indexed citations
7.
Pierce, Doris, et al.. (2011). Pediatric therapists' perspectives on occupation-based practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 19(1). 17–25. 42 indexed citations
8.
Pierce, Doris, et al.. (2010). Grandmothers' Use of Routines to Manage Custodial Care of Young Children. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics. 28(4). 360–375. 5 indexed citations
9.
Pierce, Doris. (2009). Co‐occupation: The challenges of defining concepts original to occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science. 16(3). 203–207. 69 indexed citations
10.
Hocking, Clare, et al.. (2008). The Promise of Internationally Collaborative Research for Studying Occupation: The Example of the Older Women's Food Preparation Study. OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research. 28(4). 180–190. 3 indexed citations
11.
Pierce, Doris, et al.. (2005). Cooking Up Christmas in Kentucky: Occupation and Tradition in the Stream of Time. Journal of Occupational Science. 12(3). 140–148. 27 indexed citations
12.
Pierce, Doris, et al.. (2004). An International Analysis of Holiday Food Preparation in Elderly Kentucky, New Zealand, and Thailand Women. CommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon). 1 indexed citations
13.
Pierce, Doris. (2003). Occupation by Design: Building Therapeutic Power. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 92 indexed citations
14.
Marshall, Amy D., et al.. (2002). Strategic Relevance: Using OS to Develop OT for At-Risk Youth. CommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon). 1 indexed citations
15.
Pierce, Doris. (2001). Untangling Occupation and Activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 55(2). 138–146. 160 indexed citations
16.
Pierce, Doris, et al.. (1999). A Historical Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Professional Doctorate in Occupational Therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 53(1). 64–71. 29 indexed citations
17.
Pierce, Doris. (1998). What Is the Source of Occupation’s Treatment Power?. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 52(6). 490–491. 15 indexed citations
18.
Pierce, Doris. (1991). Early Object Rule Acquisition. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 45(5). 438–449. 9 indexed citations
19.
Clark, Florence, Diane Parham, Michael Carlson, et al.. (1991). Occupational Science: Academic Innovation in the Service of Occupational Therapy’s Future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 45(4). 300–310. 282 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Pierce, Doris, et al.. (1987). The Possible Effects of a Change to Master’s Entry Level in Occupational Therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 41(10). 658–666. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026