Doris Kehl

15 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Doris Kehl
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Occupational Therapy 25
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 21
  • Clinical Psychology 62
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 21
  • General Decision Sciences 5
Replace Charles C. Benight with:
Charles C. Benight United States
Janika Mette Germany
Amin Babaei Pouya Iran
Christina Dimitriadis Australia
Stephen Bornstein Canada
Hyoung Sook Park South Korea
Vera Martins Portugal
Hyun Sook Kim South Korea
María Andrée López Gómez Canada
Monika Szeląg Austria
Doris Kehl relative to Charles C. Benight United States Charles C. Benight's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Charles C. Benight · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Doris Kehl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doris Kehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doris Kehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doris Kehl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doris Kehl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doris Kehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doris Kehl. The network helps show where Doris Kehl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Doris Kehl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Doris Kehl Line = papers co-authored together Doris Kehl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201394
2 201323
3 201420
4 201420
5 201419
6 202218
7 201516
8 201511
9 20176
10 20226
11 20145
12 20105
13 20124
14 20144
15 20151

About Doris Kehl

Doris Kehl is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Occupational Therapy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Communication, having authored 15 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disaster Management and Resilience (5 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (5 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (4 papers), Risk Perception and Management (3 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (1 paper), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper), Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper) and Disaster Response and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (25 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (21 citations), Clinical Psychology (62 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (21 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). Doris Kehl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Silke Schmidt, Lynn Hulse, Richard G. Tedeschi, Ulrich Wiesmann, Luca Pietrantoni, Gabriele Prati, Lena Spangenberg, Elmar Brähler, Kanako Taku and Ulrich John. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Applied Nursing Research, BMC Public Health and Safety Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact