Donato Liloia
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Tommaso CostaJordi ManuelloFranco CaudaAndrea NaniSergio DucaLorenzo MancusoEnrico PremiRoberto Keller
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (29 papers)Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (15 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONENeuroImageScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Donato Liloia
34 papers receiving 594 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Cognitive Neuroscience 453
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 167
- Psychiatry and Mental health 114
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 103
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 47
Countries citing papers authored by Donato Liloia
This map shows the geographic impact of Donato Liloia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donato Liloia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donato Liloia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donato Liloia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donato Liloia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donato Liloia. The network helps show where Donato Liloia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donato Liloia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donato Liloia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donato Liloia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donato Liloia. Donato Liloia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Donato Liloia
Donato Liloia is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 37 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (29 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (15 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (453 citations), Biological Psychiatry (29 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (103 citations). Donato Liloia has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tommaso Costa, Jordi Manuello, Franco Cauda, Andrea Nani, Sergio Duca, Lorenzo Mancuso, Enrico Premi, Roberto Keller, Peter T. Fox and Paola Rocca. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.