Donald E. Frederick

909 total citations
11 papers, 543 citations indexed

About

Donald E. Frederick is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Donald E. Frederick has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 543 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sensory Systems, 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Donald E. Frederick's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers). Donald E. Frederick is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers). Donald E. Frederick collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Donald E. Frederick's co-authors include Tyler J. VanderWeele, Leslie M. Kay, Daniel Rojas‐Líbano, Neil Mehta, Amanda Brown, Eileen McNeely, Vish Viswanath, Claudia Trudel‐Fitzgerald, Eric S. Kim and Paul Allin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Preventive Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Donald E. Frederick

11 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Donald E. Frederick United States 9 173 146 136 125 116 11 543
Shelly Ben‐David United States 21 212 1.2× 20 0.1× 155 1.1× 25 0.2× 171 1.5× 51 1000
Hai‐song Shi China 18 152 0.9× 23 0.2× 53 0.4× 15 0.1× 286 2.5× 37 1.1k
Xiyao Xie Germany 11 230 1.3× 12 0.1× 81 0.6× 15 0.1× 242 2.1× 13 788
Jadzia Jagiellowicz United States 8 223 1.3× 21 0.1× 42 0.3× 14 0.1× 234 2.0× 9 922
Christopher Lind Australia 12 35 0.2× 38 0.3× 53 0.4× 7 0.1× 204 1.8× 44 417
Roland Weierstall Germany 20 221 1.3× 21 0.1× 120 0.9× 42 0.3× 85 0.7× 58 1.1k
Patricia Carrington United States 11 120 0.7× 11 0.1× 46 0.3× 19 0.2× 176 1.5× 17 550
Michele Grassi Italy 13 158 0.9× 7 0.0× 38 0.3× 17 0.1× 91 0.8× 38 553
Sandra Schlegl Germany 21 97 0.6× 45 0.3× 45 0.3× 11 0.1× 74 0.6× 54 1.2k
Beyon Miloyan Australia 16 152 0.9× 19 0.1× 32 0.2× 14 0.1× 215 1.9× 24 775

Countries citing papers authored by Donald E. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donald E. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald E. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald E. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donald E. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald E. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald E. Frederick. The network helps show where Donald E. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald E. Frederick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald E. Frederick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald E. Frederick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donald E. Frederick. Donald E. Frederick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Kumar, Pawan, et al.. (2024). A review of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for characterizing Long COVID (LC)—merits, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 8(1). 101–101. 7 indexed citations
3.
VanderWeele, Tyler J., Claudia Trudel‐Fitzgerald, Paul Allin, et al.. (2020). Current recommendations on the selection of measures for well-being. Preventive Medicine. 133. 106004–106004. 125 indexed citations
4.
Frederick, Donald E. & Tyler J. VanderWeele. (2020). Longitudinal meta-analysis of job crafting shows positive association with work engagement. Cogent Psychology. 7(1). 58 indexed citations
5.
Frederick, Donald E. & Tyler J. VanderWeele. (2019). Supported employment: Meta-analysis and review of randomized controlled trials of individual placement and support. PLoS ONE. 14(2). e0212208–e0212208. 129 indexed citations
6.
Frederick, Donald E., et al.. (2017). Task-Dependent Behavioral Dynamics Make the Case for Temporal Integration in Multiple Strategies during Odor Processing. Journal of Neuroscience. 37(16). 4416–4426. 14 indexed citations
7.
Frederick, Donald E. & Tyler J. VanderWeele. (2017). Increased job crafting is positively associated with work engagement: a longitudinal meta-analysis. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 2 indexed citations
8.
Frederick, Donald E., et al.. (2016). Gamma and Beta Oscillations Define a Sequence of Neurocognitive Modes Present in Odor Processing. Journal of Neuroscience. 36(29). 7750–7767. 66 indexed citations
9.
Rojas‐Líbano, Daniel, et al.. (2014). The olfactory bulb theta rhythm follows all frequencies of diaphragmatic respiration in the freely behaving rat. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 8. 214–214. 83 indexed citations
10.
Frederick, Donald E., et al.. (2011). Rat behavior in go/no-go and two-alternative choice odor discrimination: Differences and similarities.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 125(4). 588–603. 21 indexed citations
11.
Frederick, Donald E., et al.. (2009). A critical test of the overlap hypothesis for odor mixture perception.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 123(2). 430–437. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026