Donald E. Frederick
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Mental Health Treatment and Access
Papers in
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 5
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 3
- Co-authors
- Tyler J. VanderWeele (4 shared papers)Leslie M. Kay (5 shared papers)Daniel Rojas‐Líbano (2 shared papers)Amanda Brown (1 shared paper)Neil Mehta (1 shared paper)Louis Tay (1 shared paper)Sonja Lyubomirsky (1 shared paper)Colin Farrelly (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Behavioral Neuroscience (2 papers)Journal of Neuroscience (2 papers)Preventive Medicine (1 paper)Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Donald E. Frederick
11 papers receiving 531 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Sensory Systems 146
- Social Psychology 173
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 125
- Cognitive Neuroscience 116
- Health 47
Countries citing papers authored by Donald E. Frederick
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald E. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald E. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald E. Frederick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald E. Frederick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald E. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald E. Frederick. The network helps show where Donald E. Frederick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donald E. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 129 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 125 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 83 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 58 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 11 | Increased job crafting is positively associated with work engagement: a longitudinal meta-analysis | 2017 | 2 |
About Donald E. Frederick
Donald E. Frederick is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 11 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (146 citations), Social Psychology (173 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (125 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (116 citations) and Health (47 citations). Donald E. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tyler J. VanderWeele, Leslie M. Kay, Daniel Rojas‐Líbano, Amanda Brown, Neil Mehta, Louis Tay, Sonja Lyubomirsky, Colin Farrelly, Eileen McNeely and Laura D. Kubzansky. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, Preventive Medicine, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.