This map shows the geographic impact of Don U. Deere's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don U. Deere with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don U. Deere more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don U. Deere. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don U. Deere. The network helps show where Don U. Deere may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Don U. Deere
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Don U. Deere.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Don U. Deere based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Don U. Deere. Don U. Deere is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Deere, Don U., et al.. (1993). Landslide Stabilisation at the Clyde Power Project, New Zealand. 299–319.1 indexed citations
2.
Deere, Don U., et al.. (1989). Rock quality designation (RQD) after twenty years. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core).52 indexed citations
3.
Deere, Don U. & Giovanni Lombardi. (1985). Grout Slurries—Thick or Thin?. 156–164.12 indexed citations
4.
Peck, Ralph B., et al.. (1984). Judgment in geotechnical engineering : the professional legacy of Ralph B. Peck. Wiley eBooks.11 indexed citations
5.
Peck, Ralph B. & Don U. Deere. (1978). Role of theory in geotechnical field observations. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. 15(3). 67–67.18 indexed citations
6.
Deere, Don U.. (1977). Dams on Rock Foundations - Some Design Questions. 55.3 indexed citations
7.
Cording, Edward J. & Don U. Deere. (1975). Rock tunnel supports and field measurements. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. 12(7). 95–95.7 indexed citations
8.
Deere, Don U., et al.. (1971). Rock Mechanics at Churchill Falls. 407–486.2 indexed citations
9.
Cording, Edward J., et al.. (1971). Rock Engineering for Underground Caverns. 567–600.17 indexed citations
10.
Patton, F. D. & Don U. Deere. (1971). Geologic factors controlling slope stability in open pit mines.4 indexed citations
11.
Deere, Don U., et al.. (1970). DESIGN OF TUNNEL SUPPORT SYSTEMS. Highway Research Record.27 indexed citations
12.
Deere, Don U.. (1970). INDEXING ROCK FOR MACHINE TUNNELLING.1 indexed citations
13.
Deere, Don U., et al.. (1970). Collapse of Fargo Grain Elevator. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. 96(2). 585–607.10 indexed citations
14.
Peck, Ralph B., et al.. (1969). SOME DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS IN THE SELECTION OF UNDERGROUND SUPPORT SYSTEMS.4 indexed citations
15.
Deere, Don U., et al.. (1969). Engineering Classification of In-Situ Rock.28 indexed citations
16.
Deere, Don U., et al.. (1966). Elastic-Plastic Analysis of Underground Openings by Finite Element Method. 31(1).19 indexed citations
17.
Deere, Don U., et al.. (1966). Design Of Surface And Near-Surface Construction In Rock.219 indexed citations
18.
Boresi, Arthur P. & Don U. Deere. (1963). CREEP CLOSURE OF A SPHERICAL CAVITY IN AN INFINITE MEDIUM (WITH SPECIAL APPLICATION TO PROJECT DRIBBLE, TATUM SALT DOME, MISSISSIPPI). OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.