Don E. Kash

40 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers

Don E. Kash
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Strategy and Management 392
  • Economics and Econometrics 226
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 213
  • Management Science and Operations Research 130
  • Sociology and Political Science 66
Replace M. Cordey‐Hayes with:
M. Cordey‐Hayes United Kingdom
N. Mohan Reddy United States
Ann E. Echols United States
Gerben van der Panne Netherlands
Christian Marxt Switzerland
Wilfred Schoenmakers Netherlands
Homa Bahrami United States
Guido Reger Germany
Fred Steward United Kingdom
Marthinus W. Pretorius South Africa
Don E. Kash relative to M. Cordey‐Hayes United Kingdom M. Cordey‐Hayes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. Cordey‐Hayes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Don E. Kash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Don E. Kash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don E. Kash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don E. Kash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Don E. Kash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don E. Kash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don E. Kash. The network helps show where Don E. Kash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Don E. Kash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Don E. Kash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Don E. Kash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Don E. Kash. Don E. Kash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 6
2 10
3
To Manage Complex Innovation, Ask the Right Questions: Management Today Is as Much about Identifying and Implementing Organizational Change as It Is about Facilitating Technological Change
4
4 6
5 86
6 48
7 76
8 22
9 22
10 10
11 1
12 5
13 5
14 14
15
Our Energy Future: The Role of Research, Development, and Demonstration in Reaching a National Consensus on Energy Supply
2
16 5
17 5
18 1
19 0
20 0

About Don E. Kash

Don E. Kash is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Strategy and Management and General Energy, having authored 46 papers that have together received 745 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (14 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (7 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (213 citations), Strategy and Management (392 citations) and Business and International Management (47 citations). Don E. Kash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Robert W. Rycroft, William Kingston, John G. Brainerd, E. William Colglazier, Ning Li, Tojo Thatchenkery, Roger R. Stough, S. J. Kline, W. Fulkerson and Richard C. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Research Policy and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026