Domino Determann
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Co-authors
- Esther W. de Bekker‐GrobMichael ClarkDomenico MoroStavros PetrouMattijs LambooijEwout W. SteyerbergIda J. KorfageG. Ardine de Wit
- Topics
- Economic and Environmental Valuation (8 papers)Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaDenmark
In The Last Decade
Domino Determann
15 papers receiving 997 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Economics and Econometrics 594
- General Health Professions 262
- Health 177
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 126
- Infectious Diseases 124
Countries citing papers authored by Domino Determann
This map shows the geographic impact of Domino Determann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Domino Determann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Domino Determann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Domino Determann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Domino Determann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Domino Determann. The network helps show where Domino Determann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Domino Determann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Domino Determann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Domino Determann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Domino Determann. Domino Determann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 62 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | Discrete Choice Experiments for Health Policy : past, present, and future | 1 |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literaturebreakdown → | 607 |
| 15 | 92 |
About Domino Determann
Domino Determann is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (8 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (74 citations), Economics and Econometrics (594 citations) and Health (177 citations). Domino Determann has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Esther W. de Bekker‐Grob, Michael Clark, Domenico Moro, Stavros Petrou, Mattijs Lambooij, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Ida J. Korfage, G. Ardine de Wit, Jan Hendrik Richardus and Michiel C.J. Bliemer. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Social Science & Medicine and Vaccine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.