Dominik Sala
About
In The Last Decade
Dominik Sala
9 papers receiving 496 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Oncology 385
- Immunology 180
- Molecular Biology 137
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 82
- Organic Chemistry 67
Countries citing papers authored by Dominik Sala
This map shows the geographic impact of Dominik Sala's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominik Sala with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominik Sala more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dominik Sala
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominik Sala. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominik Sala. The network helps show where Dominik Sala may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dominik Sala
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dominik Sala. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dominik Sala based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dominik Sala. Dominik Sala is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61 | |
| 2 | 44 | |
| 3 | 58 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 58 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 122 | |
| 8 | 136 | |
| 9 | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.