Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Nurses’ resilience and the emotional labour of nursing work: An integrative review of empirical literature
This map shows the geographic impact of Dominic Upton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominic Upton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominic Upton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominic Upton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominic Upton. The network helps show where Dominic Upton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dominic Upton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dominic Upton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dominic Upton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dominic Upton. Dominic Upton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dunk, Ann Marie, et al.. (2018). Exploring the impact of incontinence associated dermatitis on wellbeing. 26(4). 188–196.1 indexed citations
2.
Upton, Penney, et al.. (2014). Family-based childhood obesity interventions in the UK: a systematic review of published studies.. PubMed. 87(5). 25–9.23 indexed citations
Taylor, Charlotte, Penney Upton, & Dominic Upton. (2013). Can a school-based intervention increase fruit and vegetable consumption for children with Autism?. 31(3). 95–97.5 indexed citations
Taylor, Charlotte, et al.. (2012). What do lunchtime staff think about children's eating habits following a healthy eating intervention?. 30(4). 108–112.1 indexed citations
9.
Upton, Dominic, et al.. (2012). The Cost of Mood Disorders in Patients with Chronic Wounds.. Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester). 8(1). 107–109.4 indexed citations
10.
Upton, Penney, Charlotte Taylor, & Dominic Upton. (2012). Exploring primary school teachers' experiences of implementing a healthy eating intervention. 30(2). 35–39.2 indexed citations
11.
Upton, Dominic. (2011). Pain, wound care and psychology: The missing link?. Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester). 7(2). 119–122.5 indexed citations
12.
Upton, Dominic, et al.. (2011). The Psychological Consequences of Wounds - a Vicious Circle that Should not be Overlooked.. Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester). 7(4). 136–138.21 indexed citations
13.
Upton, Dominic & Kazia Solowiej. (2010). Pain and Stress as Contributors to Delayed Wound Healing. 18(3). 114–122.22 indexed citations
14.
Upton, Dominic & Penney Upton. (2006). Knowledge and use of evidence-based practice by allied health and health science professionals in the United Kingdom.. PubMed. 35(3). 127–33.91 indexed citations
15.
Solowiej, Kazia & Dominic Upton. (2006). Managing stress and pain to prevent patient discomfort, distress and delayed wound healing.. Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester). 106(16). 21–3.11 indexed citations
Upton, Dominic & Penney Upton. (2005). Methodological issues in nursing research: Development of an evidence-based practice questionnaire for nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 54(4). 454–458.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.