Dolores Perdomo
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Demography top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sara J. CzajaRichard SchulzSankaran N. NairDavid LoewensteinMichael H. AntoniNancy G. KlimasMary A FletcherEmily G. Lattie
- Topics
- Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (9 papers)Health, psychology, and well-being (9 papers)Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Psychiatry and Mental healthNeuropsychology and Physiological PsychologyBehavioral Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanPhilippines
In The Last Decade
Dolores Perdomo
21 papers receiving 544 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Psychiatry and Mental health 284
- General Health Professions 188
- Clinical Psychology 135
- Sociology and Political Science 81
- Demography 72
Countries citing papers authored by Dolores Perdomo
This map shows the geographic impact of Dolores Perdomo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dolores Perdomo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dolores Perdomo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dolores Perdomo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dolores Perdomo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dolores Perdomo. The network helps show where Dolores Perdomo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dolores Perdomo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dolores Perdomo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dolores Perdomo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dolores Perdomo. Dolores Perdomo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 116 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 92 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Dolores Perdomo
Dolores Perdomo is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Behavioral Neuroscience and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (9 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (9 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (284 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (16 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (30 citations). Dolores Perdomo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Sara J. Czaja, Richard Schulz, Sankaran N. Nair, David Loewenstein, Michael H. Antoni, Nancy G. Klimas, Mary A Fletcher, Emily G. Lattie, Daniel L. Hall and Amy P. Lustig. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Health Psychology and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.