DL Esseltine
About
In The Last Decade
DL Esseltine
4 papers receiving 23 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 12
- Surgery 19
- Oncology 18
- Oral Surgery 10
- Molecular Biology 4
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 4
Countries citing papers authored by DL Esseltine
This map shows the geographic impact of DL Esseltine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by DL Esseltine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites DL Esseltine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by DL Esseltine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by DL Esseltine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by DL Esseltine. The network helps show where DL Esseltine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of DL Esseltine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of DL Esseltine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of DL Esseltine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with DL Esseltine. DL Esseltine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Efficacy and safety of bortezomib-rituximab (VCR) vs rituximab® in patients (PTS) with relapsed, R-naive/-sensitive follicular lymphoma (FL): outcome according to prior therapy | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 20 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.