Dismas Baza
About
In The Last Decade
Dismas Baza
8 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 297
- Plant Science 78
- Molecular Biology 56
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 38
- Parasitology 35
Countries citing papers authored by Dismas Baza
This map shows the geographic impact of Dismas Baza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dismas Baza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dismas Baza more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dismas Baza
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dismas Baza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dismas Baza. The network helps show where Dismas Baza may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dismas Baza
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dismas Baza. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dismas Baza based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dismas Baza. Dismas Baza is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 81 | |
| 5 | 71 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | 40 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.