Diogo Proença

502 total citations
17 papers, 205 citations indexed

About

Diogo Proença is a scholar working on Information Systems, Management Information Systems and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Diogo Proença has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 205 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Information Systems, 10 papers in Management Information Systems and 2 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Diogo Proença's work include Information Technology Governance and Strategy (8 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (6 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (5 papers). Diogo Proença is often cited by papers focused on Information Technology Governance and Strategy (8 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (6 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (5 papers). Diogo Proença collaborates with scholars based in Portugal, Austria and United Kingdom. Diogo Proença's co-authors include José Borbinha, Ricardo Vieira, Christoph Becker, Gonçalo Antunes, Artur Caetano, Stefan Biffl, Dietmar Winkler, José Tribolet, Tomasz Miksa and David Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Computer Standards & Interfaces, Procedia Computer Science and Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT).

In The Last Decade

Diogo Proença

14 papers receiving 192 citations

Peers

Diogo Proença
Amy Igou United States
Shang Chen France
Peter Middleton United Kingdom
Karan Menon Finland
Chinedu Ezeigweneme United States
Diogo Proença
Citations per year, relative to Diogo Proença Diogo Proença (= 1×) peers Béatrix Barafort

Countries citing papers authored by Diogo Proença

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diogo Proença's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diogo Proença with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diogo Proença more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diogo Proença

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diogo Proença. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diogo Proença. The network helps show where Diogo Proença may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diogo Proença

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diogo Proença. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diogo Proença based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diogo Proença. Diogo Proença is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Proença, Diogo, et al.. (2018). Avaliação de maturidade da governança da informação em Arquivos. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT). 1 indexed citations
2.
Proença, Diogo, et al.. (2018). An Initial Maturity Model For Information Governance. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
3.
Proença, Diogo & José Borbinha. (2018). Formalizing ISO/IEC 15504-5 and SEI CMMI v1.3 – Enabling automatic inference of maturity and capability levels. Computer Standards & Interfaces. 60. 13–25. 11 indexed citations
4.
Proença, Diogo & José Borbinha. (2018). Using enterprise architecture model analysis and description logics for maturity assessment. 5. 102–109. 3 indexed citations
5.
Proença, Diogo & José Borbinha. (2018). Maturity Model Architect: A Tool for Maturity Assessment Support. 42–51. 5 indexed citations
6.
Proença, Diogo & José Borbinha. (2017). Enterprise Architecture: A Maturity Model Based on TOGAF ADM. 257–266. 14 indexed citations
7.
Proença, Diogo, et al.. (2017). Risk Management: A Maturity Model Based on ISO 31000. 99–108. 19 indexed citations
8.
Proença, Diogo, José Borbinha, & Ricardo Vieira. (2016). Towards a Systematic Information Governance Maturity Assessment.. iPRES.
9.
Proença, Diogo. (2016). Methods and techniques for maturity assessment. 1–4. 15 indexed citations
10.
Proença, Diogo & José Borbinha. (2016). Maturity Models for Information Systems - A State of the Art. Procedia Computer Science. 100. 1042–1049. 120 indexed citations
11.
Proença, Diogo, Ricardo Vieira, & José Borbinha. (2016). A maturity model for information governance. 1–6. 7 indexed citations
12.
Proença, Diogo, José Tribolet, & José Borbinha. (2016). Modeling the Value of Digital Preservation Activities. Procedia Computer Science. 100. 1050–1055. 1 indexed citations
13.
Borbinha, José, et al.. (2015). A Pragmatic Risk Assessment Method Supported by the Business Model Canvas. 156–162. 3 indexed citations
14.
Proença, Diogo, Gonçalo Antunes, & Tomasz Miksa. (2013). On the Assessment of Preservability: Method and Application.. iPRES.
15.
Proença, Diogo, Gonçalo Antunes, José Borbinha, et al.. (2013). Longevity as an Information Systems Design Concern.. 73–80. 2 indexed citations
16.
Proença, Diogo, Ricardo Vieira, Gonçalo Antunes, et al.. (2013). Evaluating a process for developing a capability maturity model. 1474–1475. 2 indexed citations
17.
Antunes, Gonçalo, et al.. (2012). Assessing Digital Preservation Capabilities Using a Checklist Assessment Method.. iPRES. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026