Dinh‐Van Phan

579 citations
21 papers · 404 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Dinh‐Van Phan

21 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Dinh‐Van Phan
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Accounting 75
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 69
  • Speech and Hearing 21
  • Health Information Management 13
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 30
Replace Nadia Antonucci with:
Nadia Antonucci Italy
Zhihui Zhang China
Stéphane Rossignol France
Jingyu Zhang China
Feiyan Liu China
Christoph Kurz Germany
Yewon Kim South Korea
Saeedeh Pourahmad Iran
Alain Desgagné Canada
Marco Dini Italy
Dinh‐Van Phan relative to Nadia Antonucci Italy Nadia Antonucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25×
Nadia Antonucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dinh‐Van Phan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dinh‐Van Phan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dinh‐Van Phan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dinh‐Van Phan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dinh‐Van Phan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dinh‐Van Phan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dinh‐Van Phan. The network helps show where Dinh‐Van Phan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Dinh‐Van Phan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dinh‐Van Phan Line = papers co-authored together Dinh‐Van Phan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201996
2 201155
3 201946
4 201834
5 201930
6 202028
7 202117
8 202014
9 202014
10 202213
11 202013
12 201810
13 20187
14 20205
15 20185
16 20204
17 20183
18 20163
19 20203
20 20112

About Dinh‐Van Phan

Dinh‐Van Phan is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Speech and Hearing, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Noise Effects and Management (4 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (4 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (3 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (75 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (69 citations), Speech and Hearing (21 citations), Health Information Management (13 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (30 citations). Dinh‐Van Phan has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Vietnam and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Chien‐Lung Chan, Hyung Ju Hwang, Hyunwoo Son, Nan‐Ping Yang, Yu‐Yen Ou, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le, Quang‐Thai Ho, Trinh‐Trung‐Duong Nguyen, Ren-Hao Pan and Yi‐Hui Lee. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Asthma, BMC Medical Genomics, Molecular Informatics and Analytical Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact