Ding-An Chiang

657 citations
29 papers · 465 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ding-An Chiang

24 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Ding-An Chiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Management Science and Operations Research 187
  • Statistics and Probability 102
  • Signal Processing 91
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 131
  • Artificial Intelligence 213
Replace Richard Spillman with:
Richard Spillman United States
Thomas Verma United States
Paolo Viappiani Switzerland
J.M. Zurita Spain
Or Sheffet United States
Nguyen Tho Thong Vietnam
Juan Vicente Riera Spain
Eduardo Peis Spain
Junfeng Chu China
Yungho Leu Taiwan
Ding-An Chiang relative to Richard Spillman United States Richard Spillman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Richard Spillman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ding-An Chiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ding-An Chiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ding-An Chiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ding-An Chiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ding-An Chiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ding-An Chiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ding-An Chiang. The network helps show where Ding-An Chiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ding-An Chiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ding-An Chiang Line = papers co-authored together Ding-An Chiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999179
2 200038
3 201033
4 200827
5 200022
6 200721
7 199718
8 201018
9 200115
10 198814
11 200912
12 20089
13 19899
14 19988
15 20106
16 20056
17 20056
18 20115
19 19885
20 20014

About Ding-An Chiang

Ding-An Chiang is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (10 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (9 papers), Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (9 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (8 papers), Customer churn and segmentation (7 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Text and Document Classification Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (187 citations), Statistics and Probability (102 citations), Signal Processing (91 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (131 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (213 citations). Ding-An Chiang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nancy Lin, Yifan Wang, Li Yan Yuan, Huihua Huang, Shaoping Chen, Yi-Hsin Wang, Mei‐Hua Hsu, Chun-Chi Chen, Wei Chen and Zhiyang Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Knowledge-Based Systems, International Journal of Intelligent Systems and INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact