Ding Ding

1.7k citations
55 papers · 763 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ding Ding

50 papers receiving 758 citations

Peers

Ding Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Biological Psychiatry 70
  • Neurology 89
  • Sensory Systems 42
  • Ophthalmology 70
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 115
Replace Zhenxu Xiao with:
Zhenxu Xiao China
Janusz Śmigielski Poland
Ann Liebert Australia
Anne Soop Sweden
Thomas D. Parker United Kingdom
Ufuk Ergün Türkiye
Gabriel Cuéllar-Partida Australia
Cameron G. McCarthy United States
Osorio Meirelles United States
Jacek Bogucki Poland
Ding Ding relative to Zhenxu Xiao China Zhenxu Xiao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Zhenxu Xiao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ding Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ding Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ding Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ding Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ding Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ding Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ding Ding. The network helps show where Ding Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ding Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ding Ding Line = papers co-authored together Ding Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202166
2 202165
3 202251
4 202349
5 202045
6 202038
7 202034
8 202131
9 202130
10 202226
11 201626
12 201723
13 202022
14 201918
15 202018
16 202416
17 202116
18 202215
19 202313
20 202011

About Ding Ding

Ding Ding is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Molecular Biology and Sensory Systems, having authored 55 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (5 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (4 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (70 citations), Neurology (89 citations), Sensory Systems (42 citations), Ophthalmology (70 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (115 citations). Ding Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Qianhua Zhao, Zhenxu Xiao, Wanqing Wu, Xiaoniu Liang, Jianfeng Luo, Saineng Ding, Li Zheng, Zhen Hong, Xianhui Wang and Li Hou. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Neuroepidemiology, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy and Perspectives on Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact